Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37963113›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Factors associated with use of community-based, peer-led sexual and reproductive health services by adolescent boys and young men aged 18-24 in Lusaka, Zambia: A case control study nested in the Yathu Yathu trial.

Mwelwa M Phiri, Bernadette Hensen, Lucheka M Sigande, Sian Floyd, Albertus J Schaap, Melvin Simuyaba, Lawrence Mwenge, Rosemary Zulu-Phiri, Louis Mwape, Sarah Fidler and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mwelwa M PhiriZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6029-9372
Bernadette HensenDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Lucheka M SigandeZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Sian FloydDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Albertus J SchaapZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Melvin SimuyabaZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2135-2435
Lawrence MwengeZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Rosemary Zulu-PhiriZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Louis MwapeZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Sarah FidlerFaculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Musonda SimwingaZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Richard HayesDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1729-9892
Helen M AylesZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4108-2842
Zambart · ZMLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBImperial College London · GBInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BE

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R022216/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdolescents and young people (AYP) aged 15-24 years have the least access to facility-based sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, including HIV services. The Yathu-Yathu cluster-randomized trial (CRT) in Zambia tested whether a novel peer-led community-based approach increased knowledge of HIV status amongst AYP. In this nested case-control study, we aimed to identify factors associated with non-attendance to the Yathu Yathu hubs by adolescent boys and young men (ABYM) aged 18-24-years.

methodsYathu Yathu was a CRT conducted in two communities in Lusaka, Zambia, with 10 intervention and 10 control zones. AYP in all zones were offered prevention points cards (PPC), which incentivized and tracked service use at the hubs and health facility. In intervention zones, services were provided to AYP through community-based spaces (hubs) led by peer support workers. In these zones, cases were defined as those not having accessed any service at a hub and controls as those that accessed at least one service. Data were collected from October 2020 to January 2021 and analysed using methods appropriate for unmatched case-control studies.

results161 cases and 160 controls consented to participate in the study. Participants aged 20-24 years (adjOR 1.99, 95%CI 1.26-3.12, p = 0.003), who were educated up to college level (adjOR 8.47,95%CI 2.08-34.53, p = 0.001) or who reported being employed in the last 12 months (adjOR 2.15, 95%CI 1.31-3.53, p = 0.002) were more likely to not attend the hubs. ABYM who had a friend with a PPC were more likely to attend the hubs (adjOR 0.18 95%CI 0.09-0.35, p<0.001). Most cases reported having their last HIV test at the local government health facility (58%) while most controls reported HIV-testing at a Yathu Yathu hub (82%). Among the controls, 84% (134/160) rated the hub experience as excellent. Among cases, 65% (104/161) stated they didn't visit the hubs "due to employment".

conclusionsDespite Yathu Yathu services being community-based and more accessible compared to health facilities, we found age, education and employment were associated with not attending hubs. Strategies are needed to reach employed young men who may not have access to SRH/HIV services during conventional working hours and to better utilise peer networks to increase service use.

Identifiers

PMID37963113
PMCPMC10645296
OpenAlexW4388668671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.