ArticleMMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports2023
CDC Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Anthrax, 2023.
Article in MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Antimicrobial resistance profiling and phenotypic characterization of archived clinicalMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Activities of the Novel Bacterial Topoisomerase Inhibitor OSUAB-0284 against the Biothreat PathogenACS infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Severe cutaneous anthrax with systemic complications: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- First reported survival of anthrax meningoencephalitis in a low-incidence region: successful management with mNGS-guided combination therapy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Welder's Anthrax Treated with Obiltoxaximab - Louisiana, 2024.MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report · 2026Article
- Infectious bacteria as biological warfare agents: mechanisms, epidemiological threats, and defense strategies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Targeting virulence to disarm the pathogen: Enzyme-activated-substrate inhibition of Anthrax edema factor.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters · 2025Article
- Anthrax in Koraput, India: A 15 year retrospective analysis of epidemiological trends, seasonal patterns and vaccine coverage.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Human anthrax vaccines: Current status and future prospects.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Review
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding anthrax among affected communities, Kazo district, South-Western uganda, May 2022.BMC public health · 2025Article
- In Vivo Comparison of Branched vs Linear Pegylation of a Capsule-Degrading Enzyme for Treatment of Anthrax.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Early short-course treatment fails to prevent disease or relapse upon discontinuance of treatment in infections in addition to COVID-19.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Review
- An evaluation of antibiotic options for the treatment of biothreat pathogens.Frontiers in antibiotics · 2025Review
- Anthrax meningoencephalitis: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025Article
- In-depth exploration of cutaneous anthrax: clinical and pathological manifestations of a case report.Diagnostic pathology · 2024Article
- Closing the Gaps: Testing the Efficacy of Carbapenem and Cephalosporin Treatments of Late-Stage Anthrax in Rabbits.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Determination of Dipicolinic Acid through the Antenna Effect of Eu(III) Coordination Polymer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Omadacycline is activeAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This report updates previous CDC guidelines and recommendations on preferred prevention and treatment regimens regarding naturally occurring anthrax. Also provided are a wide range of alternative regimens to first-line antimicrobial drugs for use if patients have contraindications or intolerances or after a wide-area aerosol release of: Bacillus anthracis spores if resources become limited or a multidrug-resistant B. anthracis strain is used (Hendricks KA, Wright ME, Shadomy SV, et al.; Workgroup on Anthrax Clinical Guidelines. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention expert panel meetings on prevention and treatment of anthrax in adults. Emerg Infect Dis 2014;20:e130687; Meaney-Delman D, Rasmussen SA, Beigi RH, et al. Prophylaxis and treatment of anthrax in pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:885-900; Bradley JS, Peacock G, Krug SE, et al. Pediatric anthrax clinical management. Pediatrics 2014;133:e1411-36). Specifically, this report updates antimicrobial drug and antitoxin use for both postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) and treatment from these previous guidelines best practices and is based on systematic reviews of the literature regarding 1) in vitro antimicrobial drug activity against B. anthracis; 2) in vivo antimicrobial drug efficacy for PEP and treatment; 3) in vivo and human antitoxin efficacy for PEP, treatment, or both; and 4) human survival after antimicrobial drug PEP and treatment of localized anthrax, systemic anthrax, and anthrax meningitis. Changes from previous CDC guidelines and recommendations include an expanded list of alternative antimicrobial drugs to use when first-line antimicrobial drugs are contraindicated or not tolerated or after a bioterrorism event when first-line antimicrobial drugs are depleted or ineffective against a genetically engineered resistant: B. anthracis strain. In addition, these updated guidelines include new recommendations regarding special considerations for the diagnosis and treatment of anthrax meningitis, including comorbid, social, and clinical predictors of anthrax meningitis. The previously published CDC guidelines and recommendations described potentially beneficial critical care measures and clinical assessment tools and procedures for persons with anthrax, which have not changed and are not addressed in this update. In addition, no changes were made to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations for use of anthrax vaccine (Bower WA, Schiffer J, Atmar RL, et al. Use of anthrax vaccine in the United States: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2019. MMWR Recomm Rep 2019;68[No. RR-4]:1-14). The updated guidelines in this report can be used by health care providers to prevent and treat anthrax and guide emergency preparedness officials and planners as they develop and update plans for a wide-area aerosol release of B. anthracis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.