Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37962941›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Sitafloxacin- Versus Moxifloxacin-Based Sequential Treatment for Mycoplasma Genitalium Infections: Protocol for a Multicenter, Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.

Naokatsu Ando, Daisuke Mizushima, Yosuke Shimizu, Yukari Uemura, Misao Takano, Morika Mitobe, Kai Kobayashi, Hiroaki Kubota, Hirofumi Miyake, Jun Suzuki and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Drug resistance ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naokatsu AndoAIDS Clinical Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5520-2780
Daisuke MizushimaAIDS Clinical Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8424-4616
Yosuke ShimizuBiostatistics Section, Department of Data Science, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9255-3395
Yukari UemuraBiostatistics Section, Department of Data Science, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3013-7775
Misao TakanoAIDS Clinical Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5059-110X
Morika MitobeDepartment of Microbiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1466-7661
Kai KobayashiDepartment of Microbiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4524-284X
Hiroaki KubotaDepartment of Microbiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6339-8568
Hirofumi MiyakeDepartment of Microbiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3629-5333
Jun SuzukiDepartment of Microbiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2322-9176
Kenji SadamasuDepartment of Microbiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0541-706X
Takato NakamotoAIDS Clinical Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0547-1026
Takahiro AokiAIDS Clinical Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4451-599X
Koji WatanabeAIDS Clinical Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3190-8439
Shinichi OkaAIDS Clinical Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9283-2167
Hiroyuki GatanagaAIDS Clinical Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9191-9984
National Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPTokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMycoplasma genitalium is an emerging sexually transmitted pathogen associated with increasing antibiotic resistance. The current treatment guidelines recommend moxifloxacin-sequential therapy for macrolide-resistant Mgenitalium or strains with unknown resistance profiles. However, it is unclear whether sitafloxacin, a 4th-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotic, is effective against resistant strains.

objectiveThis study aims to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of sitafloxacin- and moxifloxacin-based treatment regimens for managing Mgenitalium infections.

methodsWe will conduct this randomized controlled trial at multiple centers in Japan. Eligible participants include adults aged 18 years or older with a confirmed Mgenitalium infection, as determined through the nucleic acid amplification test. Patients will be randomly assigned using a stratified approach based on the treatment facility and infection site. The interventions comprise oral sitafloxacin (200 mg) daily for 7 days (with optional pretreatment of oral doxycycline, 200 mg, daily for up to 7 days), with a control group receiving oral doxycycline (200 mg) daily for 7 days followed by moxifloxacin (400 mg) daily for another 7 days. The primary outcome is the treatment success rate with a superiority margin of 10%, as confirmed through the nucleic acid amplification test. Secondary outcomes encompass changes in the bacterial load at the urogenital or rectal sites and the emergence of posttreatment-resistant mutant strains.

resultsEnrollment commenced in June 2023 and will conclude in December 2024, with findings anticipated by 2025. The expected success rates fall within the range of 80% for sitafloxacin and 42% for moxifloxacin against Mgenitalium carrying the G248T (S83I) mutation, based on previous studies. Accordingly, with a 5% significance level (2-sided) and 80% statistical power, we aim to recruit 50 participants per group, factoring in a 10% expected dropout rate.

conclusionsThis study will provide valuable insights into the efficacy and safety of sitafloxacin- versus moxifloxacin-based sequential therapy in treating Mgenitalium infections. These findings have the potential to influence clinical guidelines, favoring more effective therapeutic choices. The multicenter approach enhances the robustness of this study. However, a limitation is the potential insufficiency of statistical power to detect posttreatment-resistant mutant strains in each group, rendering posttreatment-resistance mutations a notable concern. In the future, we may need to increase the sample size to enhance power.

trial registrationJapan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031230111); https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs031230111. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/52565.

Indexed as

bacteriabacterialclinical trialclinical trialscontrolled trialsdoxycyclinedrugdrugsgenitalgenitaliainfectionmedicationmedicationsmoxifloxacinMycoplasma genitaliumpharmaceuticpharmaceuticalpharmaceuticalspharmaceuticspharmacologypharmacotherapypharmacyquinolone resistance-associated mutationrandomized controlled trialRCTsexually transmittedsexually transmitted infectionsexual transmissionsitafloxacinSTDSTI

Identifiers

PMID37962941
PMCPMC10685287
OpenAlexW4387895854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.