Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37962865›Full record

ArticleStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2024

DNA Damage Response After Treatment of Cycling and Quiescent Cord Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cells With Distinct Genotoxic Noxae.

Fabienne Becker, Meryem Ouzin, Stefanie Liedtke, Katharina Raba, Gesine Kogler

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabienne BeckerInstitute for Transplantation Diagnostics and Cell Therapeutics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-0997-1311
Meryem OuzinInstitute for Transplantation Diagnostics and Cell Therapeutics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9609-1642
Stefanie LiedtkeInstitute for Transplantation Diagnostics and Cell Therapeutics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1063-1215
Katharina RabaInstitute for Transplantation Diagnostics and Cell Therapeutics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8818-4219
Gesine KoglerInstitute for Transplantation Diagnostics and Cell Therapeutics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1688-6171
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 417677437German José Carreras Leukemia Foundation DJCLS18/R/2021German Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) from cord blood can be applied as an alternative to bone marrow in transplantation to treat hematological diseases. Umbilical cord blood (UCB) consists of cycling and non-cycling CD34+/CD45low cells needed for long-term and short-term engraftment. After sorting and subsequent in vitro culture, quiescent HSCs enter the cell cycle. This enables the analysis of HSCs in 2 different cell cycle stages and the comparison of their responses to different genotoxic noxae. To analyze different mechanisms of DNA damage induction in cells, 2 different genotoxins were compared: etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor that targets mitosis in the S/G2-phase of the cell cycle and the alkylating nitrosamine N-Nitroso-N-methylurea (MNU), which leads to the formation of methyl DNA adducts resulting in DNA double breaks during DNA replication and persistent mutations. Cycling cells recovered after treatment even with higher concentrations of etoposide (1.5µM/ 5µM/10µM), while sorted cells treated with MNU (0.1mM/0.3mM/0.5mM/1mM/3Mm/ 5mM) recovered after treatment with the lower MNU concentrations whereas high MNU concentrations resulted in apoptosis activation. Quiescent cells were not affected by etoposide treatment showing no damage upon entry into the cell cycle. Treatment with MNU, similarly to the cycling cells, resulted in a dose-dependent cell death. In conclusion, we found that depending on the genotoxic trigger and the cycling status, CD34+cells have distinct responses to DNA damage. Cycling cells employ both DDR and apoptosis mechanisms to prevent damage accumulation. Quiescent cells predominantly undergo apoptosis upon damage, but their cell cycle status protects them from certain genotoxic insults.

Indexed as

Fetal BloodHematopoietic Stem CellsDNA DamageDNA RepairEtoposideNoxaeEtoposideNoxaecell cyclecord bloodDNA damage responsegenotoxinshematopoietic stem cellquiescence

Identifiers

PMID37962865
PMCPMC10852021
OpenAlexW4388667044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.