ReviewCardiovascular engineering and technology2024
Overcoming Uncertainties in Electrogram-Based Atrial Fibrillation Mapping: A Review.
Review in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Characterization of Atrial Fibrillation: From Patient-Specific Anatomy and Electrophysiology to Standardized Atrial Mapping.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Review
- Article
- Systematic in-silico evaluation of fibrosis effects on re-entrant wave dynamics in atrial tissue.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical rhythmology, intracardiac bipolar electrograms (EGMs) play a critical role in investigating the triggers and substrates inducing and perpetuating atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the interpretation of bipolar EGMs is ambiguous due to several aspects of electrodes, mapping algorithms and wave propagation dynamics, so it requires several variables to describe the effects of these uncertainties on EGM analysis. In this narrative review, we critically evaluate the potential impact of such uncertainties on the design of cardiac mapping tools on AF-related substrate characterization. Literature suggest uncertainties are due to several variables, including the wave propagation vector, the wave's incidence angle, inter-electrode spacing, electrode size and shape, and tissue contact. The preprocessing of the EGM signals and mapping density will impact the electro-anatomical representation and the features extracted from the local electrical activities. The superposition of multiple waves further complicates EGM interpretation. The inclusion of these uncertainties is a nontrivial problem but their consideration will yield a better interpretation of the intra-atrial dynamics in local activation patterns. From a translational perspective, this review provides a concise but complete overview of the critical variables for developing more precise cardiac mapping tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37962813What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.