Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37962727›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2024

Protected Time for Research Among Academic Hospitalists: a Qualitative Study of Hospitalist Group Leaders.

Richard Elias, Adam Sawatsky, John Ratelle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Faculty Recruitment and Retention in Academic Plastic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Longitudinal Outcomes of a Resident Academic Administrator, Clinician Educator Track.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard EliasDivision of Hospital Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Elias.richard@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3389-5472
Adam SawatskyDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
John RatelleDivision of Hospital Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtected time is an important determinant of scholarly success in academic hospital medicine but is a limited resource.

objectiveTo explore how hospitalists procure protected time for scholarship from the perspective of academic hospital medicine leaders.

designQualitative, thematic analysis of in-depth, semi-structured interviews.

participantsTen division leaders of academic hospital medicine groups in the USA (3 female, 7 male). APPROACH: Thematic analysis, from a realist paradigm, of individually conducted interviews to explore how hospitalists obtain protected time with a focus from the leaders' perspectives on sources and strategies. Division leaders of groups known to have a reputation for regularly publishing peer-reviewed scholarship were purposively sampled and a snowball sampling technique was used to identify subsequent participants. Trustworthiness was verified by member-check with a subgroup of participants. KEY

resultsHospitalists wanting to pursue research must often start by utilizing personal time. Protected time from divisions is allocated to an individual, a project, or as administrative time. Sources of protected time are conceptualized as a hierarchy, beginning with personal time, and moving through divisional support, intramural support, and, principally for research track hospitalists, extramural support. Scaling the hierarchy is a process of demonstrating productivity and employing tactics to align projects with goals of the funders. Accessing the extramural funding tier is predicated on structured skills training, which is often acquired in early career and thus generally inaccessible to hospitalists not on a predetermined research track.

conclusionsThe prevailing paradigm for accessing protected time is one which encourages and rewards pursuing research work during non-work hours. As a hospitalist becomes more senior, the focus shifts from proving earnestness to becoming adept at navigating the institutional system as insiders.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersHospitalistsLeadershipQualitative ResearchAdultBiomedical ResearchFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedacademichospital medicineresearchresourcestime

Identifiers

PMID37962727
PMCPMC11043272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.