Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37962689›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

Development and refinement of a novel end-of-life planning website for patients with advanced cancer: a mixed methods approach.

Casey A Walsh, Jennifer Good, Anas Ismaiel, Sarah Yarborough, Megan J Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Casey A WalshClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N., Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Jennifer GoodPeacefully Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Anas IsmaielClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N., Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Sarah YarboroughClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N., Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Megan J ShenClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N., Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. mshen2@fredhutch.org.

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Eric Collisson · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
A comprehensive web-based program to help advanced cancer patients plan for end of lifeR44NR020341 · NINR · PEACEFULLY, INC. · PI GOOD, JENNIFER, SHEN, MEGAN JOHNSON · 2022 to 2024
$1.9M
Culturally Competent Communication Intervention to Improve Latinos' Engagement in Advance Care PlanningK07CA207580 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SHEN, MEGAN JOHNSON · 2017 to 2021
$915k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319NCI NIH HHS K07 CA207580NCI NIH HHS K07CA207580NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704NINR NIH HHS R44 NR020341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite known benefits of planning for end-of-life, no digital tool exists to help patients with advanced cancer and their loved ones plan for death comprehensively. To address this unmet need, we developed a preliminary version of an innovative website to help patients with advanced cancer prepare for end-of-life tasks.

methodsGuided by the Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trials (ORBIT) model for behavioral intervention development, patients with advanced cancer (n = 10) and their caregivers (n = 10) participated in a "Think Aloud" exercise and usability protocols to optimize the end-of-life planning website. The website was iteratively refined throughout the study in collaboration with the partnering company, Peacefully, Inc. Participants also completed the Acceptability E-Scale and System Usability Scale, with a priori benchmarks established for acceptability (scores of ≥ 24 on the Acceptability E-Scale) and usability (scores of ≥ 68 on the System Usability Scale).

resultsPatients (N = 10) and caregivers (N = 10) completed usability testing. Patients were majority female (80%), White (100%), and had a mean age of 58 years. Caregivers (N = 10) were majority male (60%), spouse/partner (90%), White (90%), and had a mean age of 59 years. For patients, a priori hypotheses were met for both acceptability (mean score of 24.7, SD = 4.35) and usability (mean score of 73.8, SD = 6.15). For caregivers, acceptability was just below the cutoff (mean score of 22.9, SD = 4.07) and usability exceeded the cutoff (mean score of 70.0, SD = 8.42). Overall, patients and caregivers reported high levels of satisfaction and found the website helpful, with specific suggestions for changes (e.g., add more information about information security, improve text legibility).

conclusionsThe findings from this study will inform modifications to optimize an innovative website to support patients with advanced cancer to prepare holistically for end-of-life tasks.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsBehavior TherapyDeathFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatientsResearch DesignCancerCaregiversDeathPatientsUser-computer interface

Identifiers

PMID37962689
PMCPMC11221603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.