Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37962613›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2023

Does Legislation Impede Data Sharing in Australia Across Institutions and Jurisdictions? A Scoping Review.

James Scheibner, Nicole Kroesche, Luke Wakefield, Tina Cockburn, Steven M McPhail, Bernadette Richards

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Attitudes towards data access and sharing health data for research: a case study of Australian data custodian perspectives.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James ScheibnerCollege of Business, Government and Law, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia. james.scheibner@flinders.edu.au.
Nicole KroescheAustralian Centre for Health Law Research (ACHLR), School of Law, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Luke WakefieldAustralian Centre for Health Law Research (ACHLR), School of Law, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Tina CockburnAustralian Centre for Health Law Research (ACHLR), School of Law, Faculty of Business and Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Steven M McPhailAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHSI) and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Bernadette RichardsAssociate Professor of Ethics and Professionalism, Medical School, Academy for Medical Education, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Australia, regulations governing data, including formal legislation and policies promulgated by private and public agencies, are often seen as a barrier to data sharing. This sharing can include between institutions, as well as across jurisdictional borders in a federated jurisdiction such as Australia. In some cases, these regulations place a barrier to sharing data across borders or between institutions without a prerequisite requirement. In other cases, these regulations may be perceived as a justification not to share data. The objective of this review was to analyse published literature from Australia to see what regulations were used to justify not sharing data, along with any other factors that might discourage data sharing. We searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for empirical and policy articles discussing data sharing in Australia. We then filtered these results via abstract and conducted a full text assessment to include 33 articles for analysis. Although there are a few areas of notable regulatory divergence with respect to legislation governing health data, most regulations in Australia are relatively consistent. Further, the absence of uniform ethics approval between sites in different states was frequently cited as a barrier to data sharing.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationAustraliaHumansLegislation as TopicAustraliaData sharingHealth and social welfare dataLegislation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.