ArticleLung2023
An Artificial Intelligence Platform for the Radiologic Diagnosis of Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: An Initial Pilot Study of Chest Computed Tomography Analysis to Distinguish Pulmonary Sarcoidosis from a Negative Lung Cancer Screening Scan.
Article in Lung, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Rheumatology and Systemic Inflammatory Diseases: From Pattern Recognition to Signal Analysis and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A radiomics nomogram integrated with radiological features for preoperative prediction of lung nodule invasiveness: comparison with Lung-RADS.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- A Thorough Review of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the reliability of an artificial intelligence, deep learning (AI/DL)-based method of chest computer tomography (CT) scan analysis to distinguish pulmonary sarcoidosis from negative lung cancer screening chest CT scans (Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System score 1, Lung-RADS score 1).
methodsChest CT scans of pulmonary sarcoidosis were evaluated by a clinician experienced with sarcoidosis and a chest radiologist for clinical and radiologic evidence of sarcoidosis and exclusion of alternative or concomitant pulmonary diseases. The AI/DL based method used an ensemble network architecture combining Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers (ViTs). The method was applied to 126 pulmonary sarcoidosis and 96 Lung-RADS score 1 CT scans. The analytic approach of training and validation of the AI/DL method used a fivefold cross-validation technique, where 4/5th of the available data set was used to train a diagnostic model and tested on the remaining 1/5th of the data set, and repeated 4 more times with non-overlapping validation/test data. The probability values were used to generate Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves to assess the model's discriminatory power.
resultsThe sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the AI/DL method for the 5 folds of the training/validation sets and the entire set of CT scans were all over 94% to distinguish pulmonary sarcoidosis from LUNG-RADS score 1 chest CT scans. The area under the curve for the corresponding ROC curves were all over 97%.
conclusionThis AL/DL model shows promise to distinguish sarcoidosis from alternative pulmonary conditions using minimal radiologic data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.