ArticleReproduction & fertility2023
Exploring the complexities of posthumous reproduction in fertility preservation for oncology patients with poor prognosis.
Article in Reproduction & fertility, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Denial of access to sexual and reproductive health services in Europe: an analysis of cases from the European court of human rights (1976-2023).Reproductive health · 2026Article
- The era of increasing cancer survivorship: Trends in fertility preservation, medico-legal implications, and ethical challenges.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of fertility preservation (FP) for oncology patients has evolved significantly in recent years, offering new possibilities for individuals with life-threatening illnesses. We commend Jones et al. for their comprehensive ethical review of offering FP to patients with poor prognoses, acknowledging the potential benefits that it may bring. "Poor prognosis" in this context implies a high likelihood of death due to cancer progression. We highlight the importance of considering posthumous reproduction, involving the use of cryopreserved gametes or embryos to conceive a child after one or both partners have passed away, a topic briefly mentioned by Jones et al. Posthumous reproduction raises complex ethical, logistical, and legal questions. Distinctions between cryopreserved sperm and oocytes are discussed, with each scenario presenting unique challenges. The article also examines the complexities faced by same-sex couples in posthumous reproduction, addressing issues related to donor selection, legal parentage, and rights. Legal and regulatory aspects play a crucial role, including obtaining clear and legally valid consent, defining parental rights, navigating surrogacy laws, and addressing inheritance and estate planning. Ethical dilemmas require healthcare professionals to ensure informed decision-making, consider psychological impacts, and offer information on alternative family-building options.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.