Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37962234›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2024

When do plant hydraulics matter in terrestrial biosphere modelling?

Athanasios Paschalis, Martin G De Kauwe, Manon Sabot, Simone Fatichi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Athanasios PaschalisDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4833-9962
Martin G De KauweSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3399-9098
Manon SabotARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes and Climate Change Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9440-4553
Simone FatichiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Imperial College London · GBNational University of Singapore · SGUniversity of Bristol · GBUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council CE170100023Australian Research Council Discovery Grants DP190101823Australian Research Council Discovery Grants DP190102025NERC NE/S003495/1NERC NE/X01889X/1NERC NE/Y000471/1UK Natural Environment Research Council NE/W010003/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ascent of water from the soil to the leaves of vascular plants, described by the study of plant hydraulics, regulates ecosystem responses to environmental forcing and recovery from stress periods. Several approaches to model plant hydraulics have been proposed. In this study, we introduce four different versions of plant hydraulics representations in the terrestrial biosphere model T&C to understand the significance of plant hydraulics to ecosystem functioning. We tested representations of plant hydraulics, investigating plant water capacitance, and long-term xylem damages following drought. The four models we tested were a combination of representations including or neglecting capacitance and including or neglecting xylem damage legacies. Using the models at six case studies spanning semiarid to tropical ecosystems, we quantify how plant xylem flow, plant water storage and long-term xylem damage can modulate overall water and carbon dynamics across multiple time scales. We show that as drought develops, models with plant hydraulics predict a slower onset of plant water stress, and a diurnal variability of water and carbon fluxes closer to observations. Plant water storage was found to be particularly important for the diurnal dynamics of water and carbon fluxes, with models that include plant water capacitance yielding better results. Models including permanent damage to conducting plant tissues show an additional significant drought legacy effect, limiting plant productivity during the recovery phase following major droughts. However, when considering ecosystem responses to the observed climate variability, plant hydraulic modules alone cannot significantly improve the overall model performance, even though they reproduce more realistic water and carbon dynamics. This opens new avenues for model development, explicitly linking plant hydraulics with additional ecosystem processes, such as plant phenology and improved carbon allocation algorithms.

Indexed as

EcosystemPlantsCarbonDroughtsPlant LeavesXylemCarbonecosystem recoveryecosystem responsesplant hydraulicsterrestrial biosphere modelwater stress

Identifiers

PMID37962234
PMCPMC10952296
OpenAlexW4388656697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.