Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37961991›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023

Comparison of baseline drifts using three reflector blocks versus using a single reflector block for the calibration of wall-mounted Respiratory Gating for Scanner (RGSC) camera integrated with a CT.

Bei Liu, Chengyu Shi, Maneesha Prakash, Bryan Gonzalez, Ari Kassardjian, Ji Kim, Paul Mandelin, Terence Williams, An Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Resolving signal drift in the wall-mounted camera of the RGSC system.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bei LiuDivision of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Chengyu ShiDivision of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Maneesha PrakashDivision of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Bryan GonzalezDivision of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Ari KassardjianDivision of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Ji KimDivision of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Paul MandelinDivision of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Terence WilliamsDivision of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.
An LiuDivision of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe calibration of the Respiratory Gating for SCanner (RGSC) system is critical to achieve better and more stable accuracy. The current procedure for a wall-mounted RGSC system has a relatively large residual error. PURPOSE: To compare the baseline drifts in the image acquisition of DIBH using three reflector blocks versus using a single reflector block in the calibration of a wall-mounted RGSC camera system. MATERIALS AND

methodsVarian provides a calibration plate with three rows of calibration points: each row is separated by 15 cm longitudinally and by 10 cm laterally. In Varian's single-block calibration method, the reflector block was first placed on the center point of the calibration plate and aligned with the scanner isocenter. The calibration took a picture of the block, then placed the block on the other eight points sequentially. In the proposed three-block method, we placed three reflector blocks on the center row, with the center block aligned with the isocenter, and we took a picture of the center block by manually blocking the other two blocks in calibration. By moving the couch longitudinally in or out 15 cm, the calibration goes through all nine points. Monte Carlo simulation was done using Matlab to analyze the calibration matrix eigenvalue characteristics.

resultsFor a typical scan length of 40 cm of DIBH, the residual baseline drift in simulated DIBH is 0.02 ± 0.03  versus 0.30 ± 0.12 cm for three-block calibration and single-block calibration, respectively. To achieve 0.5 mm tolerance for the eigenvalue, the laser and reflector box should be within ±3 mm uncertainties based on the eigenvalue simulation.

conclusionThree-block calibration method effectively removes baseline drift caused by couch movement in DIBH/4D CT scan for the wall-mounted camera while the single-block calibration method still has significant residual baseline drift.

Indexed as

Four-Dimensional Computed TomographyMovementCalibrationComputer SimulationHumansPhantoms, Imagingbaseline driftcalibrationRGSCwall-mounted camera

Identifiers

PMID37961991
PMCPMC10691618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.