ArticleLung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society
How do parents of wheezing children report their symptoms? A single centre cross-sectional observational study.
Article in Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preschool Wheeze and the GINA 2025 Paradigm: Challenges and Adaptations for LMICs.Indian pediatrics · 2026Review
- Advancing Equitable Participation in Pediatric Clinical Trials Through Cognitive Interviewing.Pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reported wheeze is of major relevance in the diagnosis and management of asthma and epidemiological studies on asthma prevalence. Our aim was to investigate the understanding of this term by parents and how they reported it to clinicians. Methods: A single-centre cross-sectional observational study was carried out at a tertiary care hospital. Parents of wheezing children self-completed a written questionnaire, which was analysed to understand parental understanding of the term wheeze and the main symptoms noticed by them. Their responses were compared to the operational definition used in the ISAAC study. Results: Questionnaires from 101 parents were analysed, out of which 50 children had an audible wheeze and 51 had an auscultatory wheeze. In our study, when asked about the main thing they noticed, 90 parents (89%) used non-auditory cues to identify wheeze, with the main presenting complaint being cough (n = 43, 42.6%), and only 4 (4%) reported wheezing. Even among the audible wheezers, only 7 (14%) used an auditory cue (alone or with some other cue) to describe their child's symptoms. Forty-seven parents knew the term wheeze, of which 19 parents (18.8%, N = 101) localised it to the chest, matching the epidemiological definition used in the ISAAC study. Conclusion: The word wheeze was not commonly used to describe a child's symptoms in our setting, even when the child was actively wheezing. Parents often use colloquial equivalents, nonspecific terms and other clinical cues such as coughing while reporting their child's symptoms. The parental concept of "wheezing" is different from epidemiological definitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.