Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37961960›Full record

ArticleLung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society

How do parents of wheezing children report their symptoms? A single centre cross-sectional observational study.

Mugdha Deepak Paranjpe, Sudhir Vinod Sane

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mugdha Deepak ParanjpeDepartment of Pediatrics, Jupiter Hospital, Thane, Maharashtra, India.
Sudhir Vinod SaneDepartment of Pediatrics, Jupiter Hospital, Thane, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reported wheeze is of major relevance in the diagnosis and management of asthma and epidemiological studies on asthma prevalence. Our aim was to investigate the understanding of this term by parents and how they reported it to clinicians. Methods: A single-centre cross-sectional observational study was carried out at a tertiary care hospital. Parents of wheezing children self-completed a written questionnaire, which was analysed to understand parental understanding of the term wheeze and the main symptoms noticed by them. Their responses were compared to the operational definition used in the ISAAC study. Results: Questionnaires from 101 parents were analysed, out of which 50 children had an audible wheeze and 51 had an auscultatory wheeze. In our study, when asked about the main thing they noticed, 90 parents (89%) used non-auditory cues to identify wheeze, with the main presenting complaint being cough (n = 43, 42.6%), and only 4 (4%) reported wheezing. Even among the audible wheezers, only 7 (14%) used an auditory cue (alone or with some other cue) to describe their child's symptoms. Forty-seven parents knew the term wheeze, of which 19 parents (18.8%, N = 101) localised it to the chest, matching the epidemiological definition used in the ISAAC study. Conclusion: The word wheeze was not commonly used to describe a child's symptoms in our setting, even when the child was actively wheezing. Parents often use colloquial equivalents, nonspecific terms and other clinical cues such as coughing while reporting their child's symptoms. The parental concept of "wheezing" is different from epidemiological definitions.

Indexed as

AsthmacoughISAAC studywheezingwhistling

Identifiers

PMID37961960
PMCPMC10723213
OpenAlexW4387987365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.