Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37961708›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

The

Jenna C Carlson, Mohanraj Krishnan, Shuwei Liu, Kevin J Anderson, Jerry Z Zhang, Lauren M Spor, Toni-Ann J Yapp, Elizabeth A Chiyka, Devin A Dikec, Hong Cheng and 8 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Mohanraj KrishnanORCID 0000-0002-8594-7863
Jerry Z Zhang
Elizabeth A Chiyka
Devin A Dikec
Hong Cheng
Muagututi'a Sefuiva ReupenaORCID 0000-0003-2626-4787
Satupa'itea Viali
Stephen T McGarveyORCID 0000-0003-1233-6970

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotype imputation is fundamental to association studies, and yet even gold standard panels like TOPMed are limited in the populations for which they yield good imputation. Specifically, Pacific Islanders are poorly represented in extant panels. To address this, we constructed an imputation reference panel using 1,285 Samoan individuals with whole-genome sequencing, combined with 1000 Genomes Project (1KGP) individuals, to create a reference panel that better represents Pacific Islander, specifically Samoan, genetic variation. We compared this panel to 1KGP and TOPMed-R3 panels based on imputed variants using genotyping array data for 1,834 Samoan participants who were not part of the panels. The 1KGP + 1285 Samoan panel yielded up to two times more well-imputed (r

Identifiers

PMID37961708
PMCPMC10635250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.