Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37961670›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

A Novel Semi-automated Proofreading and Mesh Error Detection Pipeline for Neuron Extension.

Justin Joyce, Rupasri Chalavadi, Joey Chan, Sheel Tanna, Daniel Xenes, Nathanael Kuo, Victoria Rose, Jordan Matelsky, Lindsey Kitchell, Caitlyn Bishop and 3 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Justin JoyceResearch & Exploratory Development, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.ORCID 0000-0003-4328-8983
Rupasri ChalavadiResearch & Exploratory Development, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Joey ChanResearch & Exploratory Development, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Sheel TannaResearch & Exploratory Development, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Daniel XenesResearch & Exploratory Development, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Nathanael KuoResearch & Exploratory Development, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Victoria RoseResearch & Exploratory Development, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Jordan MatelskyResearch & Exploratory Development, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Lindsey KitchellResearch & Exploratory Development, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Caitlyn BishopResearch & Exploratory Development, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Patricia K RivlinResearch & Exploratory Development, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Marisel Villafañe-DelgadoResearch & Exploratory Development, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Brock WesterResearch & Exploratory Development, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.

Funding

Boss: A cloud-based data archive for electron microscopy and x-ray microtomographyR24MH114785 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BROCK A. WESTER · 2018 to 2026
$6.9M
SABER: Scalable Analytics for Brain Exploration Research using X-Ray Microtomography and Electron MicroscopyR24MH114799 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GRAY RONCAL, WILLIAM R · 2017 to 2019
$1.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH114785NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH114799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immense scale and complexity of neuronal electron microscopy (EM) datasets pose significant challenges in data processing, validation, and interpretation, necessitating the development of efficient, automated, and scalable error-detection methodologies. This paper proposes a novel approach that employs mesh processing techniques to identify potential error locations near neuronal tips. Error detection at tips is a particularly important challenge since these errors usually indicate that many synapses are falsely split from their parent neuron, injuring the integrity of the connectomic reconstruction. Additionally, we draw implications and results from an implementation of this error detection in a semi-automated proofreading pipeline. Manual proofreading is a laborious, costly, and currently necessary method for identifying the errors in the machine learning based segmentation of neural tissue. This approach streamlines the process of proofreading by systematically highlighting areas likely to contain inaccuracies and guiding proofreaders towards potential continuations, accelerating the rate at which errors are corrected.

Indexed as

EM connectomicsNeural MorphologyProofreading

Identifiers

PMID37961670
PMCPMC10634717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.