Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37961626›Full record

ArticleResearch square2023

Unlocking the potential of ultra-high dose fractionated radiation for effective treatment of glioblastoma.

Xiao-Yan Lan, Lukasz Kalkowski, Cheng-Yan Chu, Anna Jablonska, Shen Li, Mihoko Kai, Yue Gao, Miroslaw Janowski, Piotr Walczak

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiao-Yan LanDalian Municipal Central Hospital.
Lukasz KalkowskiUniversity of Maryland Baltimore.
Cheng-Yan ChuUniversity of Maryland Baltimore.
Anna JablonskaUniversity of Maryland Baltimore.
Shen LiCapital Medical University.
Mihoko KaiJohns Hopkins University.
Yue GaoUniversity of Maryland Baltimore.
Miroslaw JanowskiUniversity of Maryland Baltimore.
Piotr WalczakUniversity of Maryland Baltimore.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USCapital University · USDalian Municipal Central Hospital · CNJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Two-pronged therapeutic approach for glioblastoma: high dose radiation therapy then repair of radiation-induced brain injuryR01NS102675 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WALCZAK, PIOTR · 2018 to 2019
$511k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Conventional radiation therapy for glioblastoma (GBM) has limited efficacy. Regenerative medicine brings hope for repairing damaged tissue, opening opportunities for elevating the maximum acceptable radiation dose. In this study, we explored the effect of ultra-high dose fractionated radiation on brain injury and tumor responses in immunocompetent mice. We also evaluated the role of the HIF-1α under radiation. Methods: Naïve and hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) Results: Fractionated radiation of 5×20 Gy induced severe brain damage, starting 3 weeks after radiation. All animals from this group died within 12 weeks. In contrast, later onset and less severe brain injury were observed starting 12 weeks after radiation of 3×20 Gy. It resulted in complete GBM eradication and survival of all treated animals. Furthermore, HIF-1α Conclusion: Ultra-high dose fractionated 3×20 Gy radiation can eradicate the GBM cells at the cost of only mild brain injury. The HIF-1α gene is a promising target for ameliorating vascular impairment post-radiation, encouraging the implementation of neurorestorative strategies.

Indexed as

brain injuryfractionated radiationglioblastomahypoxia-inducible factorvascular damage

Identifiers

PMID37961626
PMCPMC10635404
OpenAlexW4388124744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.