Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37961619›Full record

ArticleResearch square2023

Reassessing Estrogen Receptor Expression Thresholds for Breast Cancer Prognosis in HER2-negative Patients Using Shape Restricted Modeling.

Wenli Dong, Takeo Fujii, Jing Ning, Toshiaki Iwase, Jing Qin, Naoto T Ueno, Yu Shen

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Wenli DongUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Division of Quantitative Sciences.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1978-0371
Takeo FujiiNational Cancer Institute Center for Cancer Research.
Jing NingUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Division of Quantitative Sciences.
Toshiaki IwaseUniversity of Hawai'i Cancer Center.
Jing QinNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Naoto T UenoCancer Research Center of Hawaii: University of Hawai'i Cancer Center.
Yu ShenUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Division of Quantitative Sciences.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3899-7868
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Hawaii System · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Elucidating the role of thrombosis and inflammation in breast cancer metastasisZIABC012130 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI FUJII, TAKEO · 2023 to 2025
$2.2M
Statistical Methods for Integration of Multiple Data Sources toward Precision Cancer MedicineR01CA269696 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI JING NING, YU SHEN · 2022 to 2026
$1.7M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC012130NCI NIH HHS R01 CA269696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the dynamic link between continuous estrogen receptor (ER) expression and long-term clinical outcomes in non-metastatic breast cancer and to identify the ideal cutoff value for ER expression to optimize endocrine therapy use. Methods: The study included 3055 female patients with stage II or III HER2-negative breast cancer. The primary outcomes were time to recurrence or death (TTR) and overall survival (OS). We used a novel shape-restricted Cox model to determine the desirable ER expression cutoff to predict breast cancer prognoses. Our novel model allows ER as a continuous variable, utilizing a flexible monotone-shaped Cox regression to assess its association with survival outcomes holistically. Results: The shape-restricted Cox model identified 10% ER as the preferred cutoff to predict TTR. The finding was confirmed by the log-rank test and standard Cox model that patients with ER ≥ 10% had TTR benefit over ER < 10% (log-rank p < 0.001). No OS or TTR benefit of adjuvant endocrine therapy was observed in patients with 1% ≤ ER < 10% (HR 0.877, 95% CI 0.481-1.600, p = 0.668 for TTR and HR 0.698, 95% CI 0.337-1.446, p = 0.333 for OS). Conclusions: Using the shape-restricted Cox model, this study suggests a potential preferred threshold of 10% for predicting TTR. The findings could assist physicians in effectively weighing the benefits and risks of adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with ER < 10% disease, particularly in cases involving severe adverse events. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate the recommended cutoff value.

Indexed as

Endocrine therapyEstrogen receptorModellingSurvivalThreshold

Identifiers

PMID37961619
PMCPMC10635323
OpenAlexW4388000741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.