Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37961585›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

In praise of fossil fuel subsidies (for cooking).

Carlos F Gould, Rob Bailis, Kalpana Balakrishnan, Marshall Burke, Sebastián Espinoza, Sumi Mehta, Samuel B Schlesinger, José R Suarez-Lopez, Ajay Pillarisetti

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carlos F GouldHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego; San Diego, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7736-3905
Rob BailisStockholm Environment Institute; Somerville, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4111-3760
Kalpana BalakrishnanDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Public Health, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research; Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5905-1801
Marshall BurkeDoerr School of Sustainability, Stanford University; Stanford, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4288-5858
Sebastián EspinozaInstituto de Investigación Geológico y Energético; Quito, Ecuador.
Sumi MehtaVital Strategies; New York, USA.
Samuel B SchlesingerIndependent Consultant; Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0001-9787-5601
José R Suarez-LopezHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego; San Diego, USA.
Ajay PillarisettiSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley; Berkeley, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0518-2934

Funding

Household Air Pollution and Health: A Multi-Country LPG Intervention TrialUM1HL134590 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CHECKLEY, WILLIAM, CLASEN, THOMAS F · 2016 to 2021
$31.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS UM1 HL134590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Households that burn biomass in inefficient open fires - a practice that results in $1.6 trillion in global damages from health impacts and climate-altering emissions yearly - are often unable to access cleaner alternatives, like gas, which is widely available but unaffordable, or electricity, which is unattainable for many due to insufficient supply and reliability of electricity services. Governments are often reluctant to make gas affordable. We argue that condemnation of all fossil fuel subsidies is short-sighted and does not adequately consider subsidizing gas for cooking as a potential strategy to improve public health and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Identifiers

PMID37961585
PMCPMC10635205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.