ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Anesthetic oxygen use and sex are critical factors in the FLASH sparing effect.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Ultra-high dose-rate (UHDR) radiation has been reported to spare normal tissue compared to conventional dose-rate (CDR) radiation. However, reproducibility of the FLASH effect remains challenging due to varying dose ranges, radiation beam structure, and in-vivo endpoints. A better understanding of these inconsistencies may shed light on the mechanism of FLASH sparing. Here, we evaluate whether sex and/or use of 100% oxygen as carrier gas during irradiation contribute to the variability of the FLASH effect. Methods: C57BL/6 mice (24 male, 24 female) were anesthetized using isoflurane mixed with either room air or 100% oxygen. Subsequently, the mice received 27 Gy of either 9 MeV electron UHDR or CDR to a 1.6 cm Results: In the UHDR group, time to ulceration was significantly shorter in mice that received 100% oxygen compared to room air, and amongst them female mice ulcerated sooner compared to males. However, no significant difference was observed between male and female UHDR mice that received room air. Oxygen measurements showed significantly higher tissue oxygenation using 100% oxygen as the anesthesia carrier gas compared to room air, and female mice showed higher levels of tissue oxygenation compared to males under 100% oxygen. Conclusion: The FLASH sparing effect is significantly reduced using oxygen during anesthesia compared to room air. The FLASH sparing was significantly lower in female mice compared to males. Both tissue oxygenation and sex are likely sources of variability in UHDR studies. These results suggest an oxygen-based mechanism for FLASH, as well as a key role for sex in the FLASH skin sparing effect.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.