Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37961524›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

New information triggers prospective codes to adapt for flexible navigation.

Stephanie M Prince, Teema A Yassine, Navya Katragadda, Tyler C Roberts, Annabelle C Singer

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephanie M PrinceCoulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, United States.
Teema A YassineCoulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, United States.
Navya KatragaddaCoulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, United States.
Tyler C RobertsCoulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, United States.
Annabelle C SingerCoulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, United States.

Funding

Training In Systems And Integrative Biology NeuroscienceT32NS096050 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Yoland Smith · 2016 to 2026
$3.9M
Non-Invasive Methods to Drive Neural Activity with Millisecond Precision and to Recruit the Brain’s Immune CellsR01NS109226 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Annabelle Catherine Singer · 2018 to 2026
$2.7M
Hippocampal interneurons in novel memory formation in health and Alzheimer's diseaseRF1AG078736 · NIA · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SINGER, ANNABELLE CATHERINE · 2022 to 2025
$2.5M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG078736NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109226NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS096050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Navigating a dynamic world requires rapidly updating choices by integrating past experiences with new information. In hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, neural activity representing future goals is theorized to support planning. However, it remains unknown how prospective goal representations incorporate new, pivotal information. Accordingly, we designed a novel task that precisely introduces new information using virtual reality, and we recorded neural activity as mice flexibly adapted their planned destinations. We found that new information triggered increased hippocampal prospective representations of both possible goals; while in prefrontal cortex, new information caused prospective representations of choices to rapidly shift to the new choice. When mice did not flexibly adapt, prefrontal choice codes failed to switch, despite relatively intact hippocampal goal representations. Prospective code updating depended on the commitment to the initial choice and degree of adaptation needed. Thus, we show how prospective codes update with new information to flexibly adapt ongoing navigational plans.

Identifiers

PMID37961524
PMCPMC10634986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.