ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
MetaGate: Interactive Analysis of High-Dimensional Cytometry Data with Meta Data Integration.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flow cytometry is a powerful technology for high-throughput protein quantification at the single-cell level, widely used in basic research and routine clinical diagnostics. Traditionally, data analysis is carried out using manual gating, in which cut-offs are defined manually for each marker. Recent technical advances, including the introduction of mass cytometry, have increased the number of proteins that can be simultaneously assessed in each cell. To tackle the resulting escalation in data complexity, numerous new analysis algorithms have been developed. However, many of these show limitations in terms of providing statistical testing, data sharing, cross-experiment comparability integration with clinical data. We developed MetaGate as a platform for interactive statistical analysis and visualization of manually gated high-dimensional cytometry data with integration of clinical meta data. MetaGate allows manual gating to take place in traditional cytometry analysis software, while providing a combinatorial gating system for simple and transparent definition of biologically relevant cell populations. We demonstrate the utility of MetaGate through a comprehensive analysis of peripheral blood immune cells from 28 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) along with 17 age- and sex-matched healthy controls using two mass cytometry panels made of a total of 55 phenotypic markers. In a two-step process, raw data from 143 FCS files is first condensed through a data reduction algorithm and combined with information from manual gates, user-defined cellular populations and clinical meta data. This results in one single small project file containing all relevant information to allow rapid statistical calculation and visualization of any desired comparison, including box plots, heatmaps and volcano plots. Our detailed characterization of the peripheral blood immune cell repertoire in patients with DLBCL corroborate previous reports showing expansion of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells, as well as an inverse correlation between NK cell numbers and disease progression.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.