ArticleResearch square2023
The digital signature of emergent tremor in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Emergent tremor in Parkinson's disease (PD) can occur during sustained postures or movement that is different from action tremor. Tremor can contaminate the clinical rating of bradykinesia during finger tapping. Currently, there is no reliable way of isolating emergent tremor and measuring the cardinal motor symptoms based on voluntary movements only. Objective: Investigate whether emergent tremor during repetitive alternating finger tapping (RAFT) on a quantitative digitography (QDG) device can be reliably identified and distinguished from voluntary tapping. Methods: Ninety-six individuals with PD and forty-two healthy controls performed a thirty-second QDG-RAFT task and the Movement Disorders Society - Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (MDS-UPDRS III). Visual identification of tremor during QDG-RAFT was labelled by an experienced movement disorders specialist. Two methods of identifying tremor were investigated: 1) physiologically-informed temporal thresholds 2) XGBoost model using temporal and amplitude features of tapping. Results: The XGBoost model showed high accuracy for identifying tremor (area under the precision-recall curve of 0.981) and outperformed temporal-based thresholds. Percent time duration of classifier-identified tremor showed significant correlations with MDS-UPDRS III tremor subscores (r = 0.50, P < 0.0001). There was a significant change in QDG metrics for bradykinesia, rigidity and arrhythmicity after tremor strikes were excluded (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Emergent tremor during QDG-RAFT has a unique digital signature and the duration of tremor correlated with the MDS-UPDRS III tremor items. When involuntary tremor strikes were excluded, the QDG metrics of bradykinesia and rigidity were significantly worse, demonstrating the importance of distinguishing tremor from voluntary movement when rating bradykinesia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.