ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
JointPRS: A Data-Adaptive Framework for Multi-Population Genetic Risk Prediction Incorporating Genetic Correlation.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic prediction accuracy for non-European populations is hindered by the limited sample size of Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data in these populations. Additionally, it is challenging to tune model parameters with a small tuning dataset for methods that require tuning data, which is often the case for non-European samples. To address these challenges, we propose JointPRS, a novel, data-adaptive framework that simultaneously models multiple populations using GWAS summary statistics. JointPRS incorporates genetic correlation structures into the prediction framework, enabling accurate performance even without individual-level tuning data. Additionally, it uniquely employs a data-adaptive approach, providing a robust solution when only a small tuning dataset is available. Through extensive simulations and real data applications to 22 quantitative traits and four binary traits in five continental populations (European (EUR); East Asian (EAS); African (AFR); South Asian (SAS); and Admixed American (AMR)) evaluated using the UK Biobank (UKBB) and All of Us (AoU), we demonstrate that JointPRS outperforms six other state-of-art methods across three different data scenarios (no tuning data, tuning and testing data from the same cohort, and tuning and testing data from different cohorts) for most traits in non-European populations, while maintaining model simplicity and computational efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.