Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37960674›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Walking Bout Detection for People Living in Long Residential Care: A Computationally Efficient Algorithm for a 3-Axis Accelerometer on the Lower Back.

Mhairi K MacLean, Rana Zia Ur Rehman, Ngaire Kerse, Lynne Taylor, Lynn Rochester, Silvia Del Din

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rethinking the relationship between ambulatory activity and falls in long-term care: risk versus reward.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mhairi K MacLeanDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, 7522 LW Enschede, The Netherlands.
Rana Zia Ur RehmanTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4885-7455
Ngaire KerseSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5992-3681
Lynne TaylorSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5284-1501
Lynn RochesterTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Silvia Del DinTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1154-4751
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and reliable measurement of real-world walking activity is clinically relevant, particularly for people with mobility difficulties. Insights on walking can help understand mobility function, disease progression, and fall risks. People living in long-term residential care environments have heterogeneous and often pathological walking patterns, making it difficult for conventional algorithms paired with wearable sensors to detect their walking activity. We designed two walking bout detection algorithms for people living in long-term residential care. Both algorithms used thresholds on the magnitude of acceleration from a 3-axis accelerometer on the lower back to classify data as "walking" or "non-walking". One algorithm had generic thresholds, whereas the other used personalized thresholds. To validate and evaluate the algorithms, we compared the classifications of walking/non-walking from our algorithms to the real-time research assistant annotated labels and the classification output from an algorithm validated on a healthy population. Both the generic and personalized algorithms had acceptable accuracy (0.83 and 0.82, respectively). The personalized algorithm showed the highest specificity (0.84) of all tested algorithms, meaning it was the best suited to determine input data for gait characteristic extraction. The developed algorithms were almost 60% quicker than the previously developed algorithms, suggesting they are adaptable for real-time processing.

Indexed as

GaitWalkingAccelerationAccelerometryAlgorithmsHumansaccelerometeralgorithm designlocomotionolder adultswearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID37960674
PMCPMC10647554
OpenAlexW4388333533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.