Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37960665›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Land Use and Land Cover Classification Meets Deep Learning: A Review.

Shengyu Zhao, Kaiwen Tu, Shutong Ye, Hao Tang, Yaocong Hu, Chao Xie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shengyu ZhaoCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Kaiwen TuCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Shutong YeCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Hao TangCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Yaocong HuSchool of Electrical Engineering, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu 241000, China.
Chao XieCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7542-1270

Funding

Nanjing Forestry University College Student Practice and Innovation Training Program 2023NFUSPITP0077National Key Research and Development Program of China 2019YFD1100404National Natural Science Foundation of China 61901221National Natural Science Foundation of China 62203012Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province SJCX23_0322State Visiting Scholar Program of China Scholarship Council 202208320239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As one of the important components of Earth observation technology, land use and land cover (LULC) image classification plays an essential role. It uses remote sensing techniques to classify specific categories of ground cover as a means of analyzing and understanding the natural attributes of the Earth's surface and the state of land use. It provides important information for applications in environmental protection, urban planning, and land resource management. However, remote sensing images are usually high-dimensional data and have limited available labeled samples, so performing the LULC classification task faces great challenges. In recent years, due to the emergence of deep learning technology, remote sensing data processing methods based on deep learning have achieved remarkable results, bringing new possibilities for the research and development of LULC classification. In this paper, we present a systematic review of deep-learning-based LULC classification, mainly covering the following five aspects: (1) introduction of the main components of five typical deep learning networks, how they work, and their unique benefits; (2) summary of two baseline datasets for LULC classification (pixel-level, patch-level) and performance metrics for evaluating different models (OA, AA, F1, and MIOU); (3) review of deep learning strategies in LULC classification studies, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), autoencoders (AEs), generative adversarial networks (GANs), and recurrent neural networks (RNNs); (4) challenges faced by LULC classification and processing schemes under limited training samples; (5) outlooks on the future development of deep-learning-based LULC classification.

Indexed as

deep learningimage classificationLULCremote sensing

Identifiers

PMID37960665
PMCPMC10649958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.