Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37960589›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Deep Learning Framework for Liver Segmentation from

Md Sakib Abrar Hossain, Sidra Gul, Muhammad E H Chowdhury, Muhammad Salman Khan, Md Shaheenur Islam Sumon, Enamul Haque Bhuiyan, Amith Khandakar, Maqsud Hossain, Abdus Sadique, Israa Al-Hashimi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Deep Learning Technology and Image Sensing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Md Sakib Abrar HossainNSU Genome Research Institute (NGRI), North South University, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-5000-761X
Sidra GulDepartment of Computer Systems Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Peshawar 25000, Pakistan.
Muhammad E H ChowdhuryDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-0744-8206
Muhammad Salman KhanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.
Md Shaheenur Islam SumonDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-5839-2826
Enamul Haque BhuiyanCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
Amith KhandakarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-7068-9112
Maqsud HossainNSU Genome Research Institute (NGRI), North South University, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.
Abdus SadiqueNSU Genome Research Institute (NGRI), North South University, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.
Israa Al-HashimiHamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar.
Mohamed Arselene AyariDepartment of Civil Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-8663-886X
Sakib MahmudDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-4599-2192
Abdulrahman AlqahtaniDepartment of Medical Equipment Technology, College of Applied, Medical Science, Majmaah University, Majmaah City 11952, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6658-3240
Qatar University · QANorth South University · BDHamad Medical Corporation · QAPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SAUniversity of Engineering and Technology Peshawar · PKUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University project PSAU/2023/R/1444Qatar University student grant QUST-1-CENG-2023-796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human liver exhibits variable characteristics and anatomical information, which is often ambiguous in radiological images. Machine learning can be of great assistance in automatically segmenting the liver in radiological images, which can be further processed for computer-aided diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is preferred by clinicians for liver pathology diagnosis over volumetric abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scans, due to their superior representation of soft tissues. The convenience of Hounsfield unit (HoU) based preprocessing in CT scans is not available in MRI, making automatic segmentation challenging for MR images. This study investigates multiple state-of-the-art segmentation networks for liver segmentation from volumetric MRI images. Here, T1-weighted (in-phase) scans are investigated using expert-labeled liver masks from a public dataset of 20 patients (647 MR slices) from the Combined Healthy Abdominal Organ Segmentation grant challenge (CHAOS). The reason for using T1-weighted images is that it demonstrates brighter fat content, thus providing enhanced images for the segmentation task. Twenty-four different state-of-the-art segmentation networks with varying depths of dense, residual, and inception encoder and decoder backbones were investigated for the task. A novel cascaded network is proposed to segment axial liver slices. The proposed framework outperforms existing approaches reported in the literature for the liver segmentation task (on the same test set) with a dice similarity coefficient (DSC) score and intersect over union (IoU) of 95.15% and 92.10%, respectively.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAbdomenHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiverMagnetic Resonance Imagingautomated liver segmentationdeep learningdiagnostic radiologyMRIT1-weighted contrast

Identifiers

PMID37960589
PMCPMC10650219
OpenAlexW4388130317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.