Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37960542›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Land Cover Classification Based on Airborne Lidar Point Cloud with Possibility Method and Multi-Classifier.

Danjing Zhao, Linna Ji, Fengbao Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Danjing ZhaoSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China.
Linna JiSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China.
Fengbao YangSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China.

Funding

Central Government Leading Local Science and Technology Development Fund Project YDZJSX2021C008National Natural Science Foundation of China 61972363Postgraduate Science and Technology Project of North University of China 20221832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As important geospatial data, point cloud collected from an aerial laser scanner (ALS) provides three-dimensional (3D) information for the study of the distribution of typical urban land cover, which is critical in the construction of a "digital city". However, existing point cloud classification methods usually use a single machine learning classifier that experiences uncertainty in making decisions for fuzzy samples in confusing areas. This limits the improvement of classification accuracy. To take full advantage of different classifiers and reduce uncertainty, we propose a classification method based on possibility theory and multi-classifier fusion. Firstly, the feature importance measure was performed by the XGBoost algorithm to construct a feature space, and two commonly used support vector machines (SVMs) were the chosen base classifiers. Then, classification results from the two base classifiers were quantitatively evaluated to define the confusing areas in classification. Finally, the confidence degree of each classifier for different categories was calculated by the confusion matrix and normalized to obtain the weights. Then, we synthesize different classifiers based on possibility theory to achieve more accurate classification in the confusion areas. DALES datasets were utilized to assess the proposed method. The results reveal that the proposed method can significantly improve classification accuracy in confusing areas.

Indexed as

ALSclassifier fusionland cover classificationpoint cloudpossibility theorySVM

Identifiers

PMID37960542
PMCPMC10648668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.