Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37960520›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Pedestrian Safety in Frontal Tram Collision, Part 1: Historical Overview and Experimental-Data-Based Biomechanical Study of Head Clashing in Frontal and Side Impacts.

Frantisek Lopot, Lubos Tomsovsky, Frantisek Marsik, Jan Masek, Petr Kubovy, Roman Jezdik, Monika Sorfova, Barbora Hajkova, Dita Hylmarova, Martin Havlicek and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Frantisek LopotDepartment of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic.
Lubos TomsovskyDepartment of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0047-6028
Frantisek MarsikDepartment of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan MasekVUKV a.s., 158 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr KubovyDepartment of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic.
Roman JezdikVUKV a.s., 158 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
Monika SorfovaDepartment of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3442-7796
Barbora HajkovaDepartment of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic.
Dita HylmarovaDepartment of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin HavlicekDepartment of Designing and Machine Elements, Czech Technical University, 166 29 Prague, Czech Republic.
Ondrej StocekDepartment of Designing and Machine Elements, Czech Technical University, 166 29 Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin DoubekDopravní Podnik Hlavního Města Prahy, 190 22 Prague, Czech Republic.
Tommi TikkanenGIM Oy, 02650 Espoo, Finland.
Martin SvobodaFaculty of Mechanical Engineering, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University, Pasteurova 3544/1, 400 96 Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7344-1531
Karel JelenDepartment of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8151-9810

Funding

Ministry of Education Youth and Sports CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_026/0008401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article represents the first paper in a two-part series dealing with safety during tram-pedestrian collisions. This research is dedicated to the safety of trams for pedestrians during collisions and is motivated by the increased number of lethal cases. The first part of this paper includes an overview of tram face development from the earliest designs to the current ones in use and, at the same time, provides a synopsis and explanation of the technical context, including a link to current and forthcoming legislation. The historical design development can be characterised by three steps, from an almost vertical front face, to leaned and pointed shapes, to the current inclined low-edged windshield without a protruding coupler. However, since most major manufacturers now export their products worldwide and customisation is only of a technically insignificant nature, our conclusions are generalisable (supported by the example of Berlin). The most advantageous shape of the tram's front, minimising the effects on pedestrians in all collision phases, has evolved rather spontaneously and was unprompted, and it is now being built into the European Commission regulations. The goal of the second part of this paper is to conduct a series of tram-pedestrian collisions with a focus on the frontal and side impacts using a crash test dummy (anthropomorphic test device-ATD). Four tram types approaching the collision at four different impact speeds (5 km/h, 10 km/h, 15 km/h, and 20 km/h) were used. The primary outcome variable was the resultant head acceleration. The risk and severity of possible head injuries were assessed using the head injury criterion (

Indexed as

Craniocerebral TraumaPedestriansWounds and InjuriesAccidents, TrafficHumansMotor VehiclesWalkingcollisioncrash testfront face designhead injury criterionpedestriansafetytramwindshield

Identifiers

PMID37960520
PMCPMC10648294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.