Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37960493›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Validity and Reliability of Inertial Measurement Units in Active Range of Motion Assessment in the Hip Joint.

Łukasz Stołowski, Maciej Niedziela, Bartłomiej Lubiatowski, Przemysław Lubiatowski, Tomasz Piontek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Łukasz StołowskiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rehasport Clinic, 60-201 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5705-3830
Maciej NiedzielaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rehasport Clinic, 60-201 Poznan, Poland.
Bartłomiej LubiatowskiRSQ Technologies, 27 Grudnia 3, 61-737 Poznan, Poland.
Przemysław LubiatowskiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rehasport Clinic, 60-201 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1011-981X
Tomasz PiontekDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rehasport Clinic, 60-201 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0555-2608

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring joint range of motion has traditionally occurred with a universal goniometer, inclinometer, or expensive laboratory systems. The popularity of the inertial measurement unit (IMU) is growing, enabling the small and even single portable device to measure the range of motion. Until now, they were not used to assess hip joint range of motion. Our study aimed to check the validity of IMUs in assessing hip range of motion and compare them to other measurement devices-universal goniometer and inclinometer. Twenty participants completed three hip movements (flexion in standing and prone internal and external rotation) on both hips. Two testers independently assessed each movement with a goniometer, digital inclinometer, and IMU at different time points. To assess the agreement of active hip ROM between devices, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were used. Furthermore, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were also assessed by using ICC and Bland-Altman analysis. Limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated using Bland-Altman plots. The IMU demonstrated good to excellent validity (ICC: 0.87-0.99) compared to the goniometer and digital inclinometer, with LOAs < 9°, across all tested movements. Intra-rater reliability was excellent for all devices (ICC: 0.87-0.99) with LOAs < 7°. However, inter-rater reliability was moderate for flexion (ICC: 0.58-0.59, LOAs < 22.4) and poor for rotations (ICC: -0.33-0.04, LOAs < 7.8°). The present study shows that a single inertial measurement unit (RSQ Motion, RSQ Technologies, Poznan, Poland) could be successfully used to assess the active hip range of motion in healthy subjects, comparable to other methods accuracy.

Indexed as

Arthrometry, ArticularHip JointHumansRange of Motion, ArticularReproducibility of ResultsRotationgoniometerhip range of motionIMUinclinometer

Identifiers

PMID37960493
PMCPMC10650004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.