Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37960487›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Cross-Day Analysis of EMG Features, Classifiers, and Regressors for Swallowing Events Detection and Fluid Intake Volume Estimation.

Iman Ismail, Imran Khan Niazi, Heidi Haavik, Ernest N Kamavuako

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iman IsmailDepartment of Engineering, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9846-6674
Imran Khan NiaziCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, 6 Harisson Road, Mount Wallington, Auckland 1060, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8752-7224
Heidi HaavikCentre for Chiropractic Research, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, 6 Harisson Road, Mount Wallington, Auckland 1060, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7182-2085
Ernest N KamavuakoDepartment of Engineering, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6846-2090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dehydration is a common problem among older adults. It can seriously affect their health and wellbeing and sometimes leads to death, given the diminution of thirst sensation as we age. It is, therefore, essential to keep older adults properly hydrated by monitoring their fluid intake and estimating how much they drink. This paper aims to investigate the effect of surface electromyography (sEMG) features on the detection of drinking events and estimation of the amount of water swallowed per sip. Eleven individuals took part in the study, with data collected over two days. We investigated the best combination of a pool of twenty-six time and frequency domain sEMG features using five classifiers and seven regressors. Results revealed an average F-score over two days of 77.5±1.35% in distinguishing the drinking events from non-drinking events using three global features and 85.5±1.00% using three subject-specific features. The average volume estimation RMSE was 6.83±0.14 mL using one single global feature and 6.34±0.12 mL using a single subject-specific feature. These promising results validate and encourage the potential use of sEMG as an essential factor for monitoring and estimating the amount of fluid intake.

Indexed as

DeglutitionDrinkingAgedElectromyographyHumansclassificationdehydrationdrinkingelectromyography sensorsEMG featuresfluid estimationfluid intake

Identifiers

PMID37960487
PMCPMC10650012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.