ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Microwave Imaging of Anisotropic Objects by Artificial Intelligence Technology.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we present the microwave imaging of anisotropic objects by artificial intelligence technology. Since the biaxial anisotropic scatterers have different dielectric constant components in different transverse directions, the problems faced by transverse electronic (TE) polarization waves are more complex than those of transverse magnetic (TM) polarization waves. In other words, measured scattered field information can scarcely reconstruct microwave images due to the high nonlinearity characteristic of TE polarization. Therefore, we first use the dominant current scheme (DCS) and the back-propagation scheme (BPS) to compute the initial guess image. We then apply a trained convolution neural network (CNN) to regenerate the microwave image. Numerical results show that the CNN possesses a good generalization ability under limited training data, which could be favorable to deploy in image processing. Finally, we compare DCS and BPS reconstruction images for anisotropic objects by the CNN and prove that DCS is better than BPS. In brief, successfully reconstructing biaxial anisotropic objects with a CNN is the contribution of this proposal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.