ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Mass Reduction Techniques for Short Backfire Antennas: Additive Manufacturing and Structural Perforations.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gain and Bandwidth Enhancement of 3D-Printed Short Backfire Antennas Using Rim Flaring and Iris Matching.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents novel approaches for reducing the mass of the classical short backfire (SBF) antenna by using additive manufacturing and structural perforations. We first investigated techniques to create a 3D-printed structure with a conductive coating material. This approach resulted in a significant mass reduction (70%) compared with the conventional metallic structure. We performed parametric simulation studies to investigate the effects of the manufacturing process and showed that there was practically no difference in the performance. The largest source of error was the surface roughness and the conductivity of the metal paint. In a second design, we created perforations in the structure to further reduce the mass. We performed parametric studies to optimize mass reduction and to characterize the effects of the perforations and the surface roughness introduced during the 3D-printing process on the antenna. Antenna prototypes were fabricated and tested. The masses of the perforated 3D printed antenna were approximately 30% and 20% of the original aluminum design, respectively (70% and 80% reductions in mass, respectively). The good agreement among the original design, simulation, and measurements demonstrated the effectiveness of the approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.