ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
CHP Engine Anomaly Detection Based on Parallel CNN-LSTM with Residual Blocks and Attention.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A deep residual 1D-CNN with self-attention for fraud transaction detection in virtual economies.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The extreme operating environment of the combined heat and power (CHP) engine is likely to cause anomalies and defects, which can lead to engine failure; thus, detecting engine anomalies is essential. In this study, we propose a parallel convolutional neural network-long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM) residual blocks attention (PCLRA) anomaly detection model with engine sensor data. To our knowledge, this is the first time that parallel CNN-LSTM-based networks have been used in the field of CHP engine anomaly detection. In PCLRA, spatiotemporal features are extracted via CNN-LSTM in parallel and the information loss is compensated using the residual blocks and attention mechanism. The performance of PCLRA is compared with various hybrid models for 15 cases. First, the performances of serial and parallel models are compared. In addition, we evaluated the contributions of the residual blocks and attention mechanism to the performance of the CNN-LSTM hybrid model. The results indicate that PCLRA achieves the best performance, with a macro f1 score (mean ± standard deviation) of 0.951 ± 0.033, an anomaly f1 score of 0.903 ± 0.064, and an accuracy of 0.999 ± 0.002. We expect that the energy efficiency and safety of CHP engines can be improved by applying the PCLRA anomaly detection model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.