Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37960411›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

DeepVision: Enhanced Drone Detection and Recognition in Visible Imagery through Deep Learning Networks.

Hassan J Al Dawasari, Muhammad Bilal, Muhammad Moinuddin, Kamran Arshad, Khaled Assaleh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hassan J Al DawasariElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0009-8943-6452
Muhammad BilalElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6446-8687
Muhammad MoinuddinElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4735-0692
Kamran ArshadDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering and Information Technology, Ajman University, Ajman 346, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-4447-8335
Khaled AssalehDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering and Information Technology, Ajman University, Ajman 346, United Arab Emirates.
King Abdulaziz University · SAAjman University · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drones are increasingly capturing the world's attention, transcending mere hobbies to revolutionize areas such as engineering, disaster aid, logistics, and airport protection, among myriad other fascinating applications. However, there is growing concern about the risks that they pose to physical infrastructure, particularly at airports, due to potential misuse. In recent times, numerous incidents involving unauthorized drones at airports disrupting flights have been reported. To solve this issue, this article introduces an innovative deep learning method proposed to effectively distinguish between drones and birds. Evaluating the suggested approach with a carefully assembled image dataset demonstrates exceptional performance, surpassing established detection systems previously proposed in the literature. Since drones can appear extremely small compared to other aerial objects, we developed a robust image-tiling technique with overlaps, which showed improved performance in the presence of very small drones. Moreover, drones are frequently mistaken for birds due to their resemblances in appearance and movement patterns. Among the various models tested, including SqueezeNet, MobileNetV2, ResNet18, and ResNet50, the SqueezeNet model exhibited superior performance for medium area ratios, achieving higher average precision (AP) of 0.770. In addition, SqueezeNet's superior AP scores, faster detection times, and more stable precision-recall dynamics make it more suitable for real-time, accurate drone detection than the other existing CNN methods. The proposed approach has the ability to not only detect the presence or absence of drones in a particular area but also to accurately identify and differentiate between drones and birds. The dataset utilized in this research was obtained from a real-world dataset made available by a group of universities and research institutions as part of the 2020 Drone vs. Bird Detection Challenge. We have also tested the performance of the proposed model on an unseen dataset, further validating its better performance.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclassificationdeep learningdrones detectiontransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37960411
PMCPMC10649875
OpenAlexW4388266596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.