Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37960398›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

On-Device Execution of Deep Learning Models on HoloLens2 for Real-Time Augmented Reality Medical Applications.

Silvia Zaccardi, Taylor Frantz, David Beckwée, Eva Swinnen, Bart Jansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Silvia ZaccardiDepartment of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9133-7762
Taylor FrantzDepartment of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9450-0529
David BeckwéeRehabilitation Research Group (RERE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9951-9993
Eva SwinnenRehabilitation Research Group (RERE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3771-9479
Bart JansenDepartment of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8042-6834

Funding

Research Foundation - Flanders FWOSB139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of Deep Learning (DL) models with the HoloLens2 Augmented Reality (AR) headset has enormous potential for real-time AR medical applications. Currently, most applications execute the models on an external server that communicates with the headset via Wi-Fi. This client-server architecture introduces undesirable delays and lacks reliability for real-time applications. However, due to HoloLens2's limited computation capabilities, running the DL model directly on the device and achieving real-time performances is not trivial. Therefore, this study has two primary objectives: (i) to systematically evaluate two popular frameworks to execute DL models on HoloLens2-Unity Barracuda and Windows Machine Learning (WinML)-using the inference time as the primary evaluation metric; (ii) to provide benchmark values for state-of-the-art DL models that can be integrated in different medical applications (e.g., Yolo and Unet models). In this study, we executed DL models with various complexities and analyzed inference times ranging from a few milliseconds to seconds. Our results show that Unity Barracuda is significantly faster than WinML (

Indexed as

Augmented RealityDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningReproducibility of Resultsaugmented realitydeep learningHoloLens2machine learningmixed realityUnity BarracudaWindows Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID37960398
PMCPMC10648161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.