Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37960179›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Opportunities for Maximizing the Dietary Quality of Fad Diets.

Jessica M Phelan, Jillian M Joyce, Katherine Bode, Sara K Rosenkranz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica M PhelanDepartment of Food Nutrition Dietetics and Health, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-4305-0542
Jillian M JoyceDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Katherine BodeDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Sara K RosenkranzDepartment of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3297-1640

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality of American diets, measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), has remained stable and low since 2005. The Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2020-2025 call for research analyzing dietary patterns to determine how guidelines might be altered to increase healthy eating. The present paper seeks to determine the dietary quality of popular fad dietary patterns among Americans. A definition of "fad diet" was created, and Google Trends© was searched for popular diets to determine popular dietary patterns based on the fad diet definition. Finally, eight dietary patterns were identified for inclusion. One-week sample menus were created for each dietary pattern, maximizing alignment with the DGAs but staying within the dietary pattern parameters, and then scored according to the HEI 2015 to determine the dietary quality. Total HEI scores ranged from 26.7 (Carnivore) to 89.1 (Low-FODMAP); the six highest total HEI scores were in the range of 77.1-89.1 out of 100 points. This analytical approach showed that some of the included popular fad dietary patterns have the potential to attain a high dietary quality. Rather than suggesting one "best" diet or dietary pattern, there is opportunity to maximize dietary quality in the context of dietary patterns that are considered fad diets.

Indexed as

DietDiet, HealthyDiet FadsHumansNutrition PolicySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statescollege studentdietary analysisdietary qualityfad diethealthy eating index

Identifiers

PMID37960179
PMCPMC10649867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.