Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37960169›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Diet-Nutrition Information Seeking, Source Trustworthiness, and Eating Behavior Changes: An International Web-Based Survey.

Maria A Ruani, Michael J Reiss, Anastasia Z Kalea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Content accuracy and readability of dietary advice available on webpages: A systematic review of the evidence.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria A RuaniCurriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment, Institute of Education, Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, London WC1H 0AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8191-0166
Michael J ReissCurriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment, Institute of Education, Faculty of Education and Society, University College London, London WC1H 0AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1207-4229
Anastasia Z KaleaFaculty of Medical Sciences, Division of Medicine, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5775-3984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the extent to which different sources of diet and nutrition information are sought, trusted, and relied upon for making dietary changes, the present international web-based survey study gauged participants' (

Indexed as

DietInformation Seeking BehaviorFeeding BehaviorHumansInternetNutritional StatusSurveys and Questionnairescommunicationdietary changeeating behavior changeinformation-seeking behaviorsliteracymisinformed beliefsnutrition misinformationpublic healthsocial mediasources of informationsource trustworthiness

Identifiers

PMID37960169
PMCPMC10649819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.