Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37960048›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Multi-Model Based Stability Analysis Employing Multi-Environmental Trials (METs) Data for Discerning Heat Tolerance in Chickpea (

Thippeswamy Danakumara, Tapan Kumar, Neeraj Kumar, Basavanagouda Siddanagouda Patil, Chellapilla Bharadwaj, Umashankar Patel, Nilesh Joshi, Shayla Bindra, Shailesh Tripathi, Rajeev Kumar Varshney and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Thippeswamy DanakumaraICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
Tapan KumarInternational Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas, Sehore 466113, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Neeraj KumarICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4908-2249
Basavanagouda Siddanagouda PatilICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
Chellapilla BharadwajICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1651-7878
Umashankar PatelICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
Nilesh JoshiICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
Shayla BindraDepartment of Plant Breeding & Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141027, Panjab, India.
Shailesh TripathiICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur 282004, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rajeev Kumar VarshneyCentre for Crop & Food Innovation, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4562-9131
Sushil Kumar ChaturvediDepartment of Genetics & Plant Breeding, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, Jhansi 284003, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

ICAR-BMGF Project 12-229ICAR-IARI inhouse facilitiesICAR-IRA 21-51
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying a congenially targeted production environment and understanding the effects of genotype by environmental interactions on the adaption of chickpea genotypes is essential for achieving an optimal yield stability. Different models like additive main effect and multiplicative interactions (AMMI 1, AMM2), weighted average absolute scores of BLUPs (WAASB), and genotype plus genotype-environment (GGE) interactions were used to understand their suitability in the precise estimation of variance and their interaction. Our experiment used genotypes that represent the West Asia-North Africa (WANA) region. This trial involved two different sowing dates, two distinct seasons, and three different locations, resulting in a total of 12 environments. Genotype IG 5871(G1) showed a lower heat susceptibility index (HSI) across environments under study. The first four interactions principal component axis (IPCA) explain 93.2% of variations with significant genotype-environment interactions. Considering the AMMI stability value (ASV), the genotypes IG5862(G7), IG5861(G6), ILC239(G40), IG6002(G26), and ILC1932(G39), showing ASV scores of 1.66, 1.80, 2.20, 2.60, and 2.84, respectively, were ranked as the most stable and are comparable to the weighted average absolute scores of BLUPs (WAASB) ranking of genotypes. The which-won-where pattern of genotype plus genotype-environment (GGE) interactions suggested that the target environment consists of one mega environment. IG5866(G10), IG5865(G9), IG5884(G14), and IG5862(G7) displayed higher stability, as they were nearer to the origin. The genotypes that exhibited a superior performance in the tested environments can serve as ideal parental lines for heat-stress tolerance breeding programs. The weighted average absolute scores of BLUPs (WAASB) serve as an ideal tool to discern the variations and identify the stable genotype among all methods.

Indexed as

AMMIchickpeaGGEheat susceptibility indexWAASB

Identifiers

PMID37960048
PMCPMC10647285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.