ArticlePolymers2023
FDM 3D Printing and Properties of PBS/PLA Blends.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing PLA Strength and Layer Adhesion: Physical and Microstructural Insights from Vibration-Assisted FFF/FDM.Polymers · 2026Article
- Comparison of industrial- and medical-grade silicone phantoms for surgical laser training in dental students.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Development of CS/PLA Composites with Enhanced Ductility via PBS Elastomer Reinforcement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Investigation of the Influence of Manufacturing on Filament Production and Its Impact on Additive Manufactured Structures.Polymers · 2025Article
- The Use of 3D Printing Filaments to Build Moisture Sensors in Porous Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Low-Hydrophilic HKUST-1/Polymer Extrudates for the PSA Separation of COMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- FDM 3D Printing and Properties of PBAT/PLA Blends.Polymers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and Poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) were chosen as raw materials and melt blended by a twin screw extruder and pelletized; then, the pellets were extruded into filaments; after that, various PBS/PLA blending samples were prepared by Fused Deposition Molding (FDM) 3D printing technology using the filaments obtained and the effect of the dosage of PBS on technological properties of 3D-printed specimens was investigated. For comparison, the PLA specimen was also prepared by FDM printing. The tensile strength, tensile modulus, thermal stability, and hydrophilicity became poorer with increasing the dosage of PBS, while the flexural strength, flexural modulus, impact strength, and crystallinity increased first and then decreased. The blend containing 10% PBS (10% PBS/PLA) had the greatest flexural strength of 60.12 MPa, tensile modulus of 2360.04 MPa, impact strength of 89.39 kJ/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.