Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37959963›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

Shear Strength of Repaired 3D-Printed and Milled Provisional Materials Using Different Resin Materials with and without Chemical and Mechanical Surface Treatment.

Harisha Dewan, Mohammed E Sayed, Asayil Jundus, Mafaz Gharawi, Safeyah Baeshen, Maimonah Alali, Mai Almarzouki, Hossam F Jokhadar, Saad Saleh AlResayes, Mohammed H D Al Wadei and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Influence of Surface Conditioning Protocols and Lining Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Aged 3D-Printed Onlay Restorations.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Harisha DewanDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed E SayedDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8667-8987
Asayil JundusCollege of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Mafaz GharawiCollege of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Safeyah BaeshenCollege of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Maimonah AlaliCollege of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Mai AlmarzoukiDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Hossam F JokhadarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0540-7208
Saad Saleh AlResayesDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5569-9133
Mohammed H D Al WadeiDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz ThubabCollege of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Jabril Abu IllahCollege of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.
Alkhansa MoafaCollege of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the shear bond strength of 3D-printed and milled provisional restorations using various resin materials and surface finishes. There were 160 preliminary samples in all, and they were split into two groups: the milled group and the 3D-printed group. Based on the resin used for repair (composite or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)) and the type of surface treatment utilized (chemical or mechanical), each group was further divided into subgroups. The specimens were subjected to thermocycling from 5 °C to 55 °C for up to 5000 thermal cycles with a dwell time of 30 s. The mechanical qualities of the repaired material underwent testing for shear bond strength (SBS). To identify the significant differences between the groups and subgroups, a statistical analysis was carried out. Three-way ANOVA was used to analyze the effects of each independent component (the material and the bonding condition), as well as the interaction between the independent factors on shear bond strength. Tukey multiple post-hoc tests were used to compare the mean results for each material under various bonding circumstances. The shear bond strengths of the various groups and subgroups differed significantly (

Indexed as

3D printingchemical surface treatmentmechanical surface treatmentmillingprovisional materialsresin materialsrestorative dentistryshear strength

Identifiers

PMID37959963
PMCPMC10648486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.