ArticlePolymers2023
Numerical Study on the Damage of a Carbon Woven Composite Panel Subjected to Blast Loading.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blast loading represents a critical dynamic condition for engineering structures. While the response of metal materials to such a condition has been studied in detail, the behavior of composites has not been properly addressed yet. In this context, this work leverages numerical methods to assess the damage that occurs in a carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer plate subjected to close-range blast loading. Numerical analyses were carried out using two methods, i.e., the pure Lagrangian and hybrid coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian approaches. The simulations were validated against observations from a benchmark experimental test taken from the literature. The results showed that (i) the hybrid approach seems to be the most promising solution in terms of efficiency and accuracy; (ii) the Lagrangian approach can accurately reproduce the experimental observations, even though it comes with strong limitations; and (iii) the numerically predicted damage adheres to the experimentally observed damage, although the simulation outcome is influenced by the modeling technique used to describe the behavior of the composite material. We consider the approaches presented in this paper promising for investigation of blast-loaded composite structures, and further improvements can be achieved by (i) refining the description of the material behavior, e.g., by including the strain rate sensitivity; and (ii) better modeling the boundary conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.