Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37959949›Full record

ArticlePolymers2023

Numerical Study on the Damage of a Carbon Woven Composite Panel Subjected to Blast Loading.

Alessandro Vescovini, Luca Lomazzi, Marco Giglio, Andrea Manes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alessandro VescoviniPolitecnico di Milano, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Via La Masa n.1, 20156 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1773-2884
Luca LomazziPolitecnico di Milano, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Via La Masa n.1, 20156 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9841-5778
Marco GiglioPolitecnico di Milano, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Via La Masa n.1, 20156 Milan, Italy.
Andrea ManesPolitecnico di Milano, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Via La Masa n.1, 20156 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7485-8980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blast loading represents a critical dynamic condition for engineering structures. While the response of metal materials to such a condition has been studied in detail, the behavior of composites has not been properly addressed yet. In this context, this work leverages numerical methods to assess the damage that occurs in a carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer plate subjected to close-range blast loading. Numerical analyses were carried out using two methods, i.e., the pure Lagrangian and hybrid coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian approaches. The simulations were validated against observations from a benchmark experimental test taken from the literature. The results showed that (i) the hybrid approach seems to be the most promising solution in terms of efficiency and accuracy; (ii) the Lagrangian approach can accurately reproduce the experimental observations, even though it comes with strong limitations; and (iii) the numerically predicted damage adheres to the experimentally observed damage, although the simulation outcome is influenced by the modeling technique used to describe the behavior of the composite material. We consider the approaches presented in this paper promising for investigation of blast-loaded composite structures, and further improvements can be achieved by (i) refining the description of the material behavior, e.g., by including the strain rate sensitivity; and (ii) better modeling the boundary conditions.

Indexed as

blast loadingCFRPnumerical simulationreinforced polymers

Identifiers

PMID37959949
PMCPMC10648481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.