ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Immunosuppressive Therapy and Nutritional Status of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: A Protocol for a Systematic Review.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Immunosuppressive therapy and nutritional diseases of patients after kidney transplantation: a systematic review.BMC nephrology · 2025Pooled it
- Immunosuppressive Therapy and Nutritional Status of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: A Protocol for a Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: Kidney transplantation is widely recognized as the most effective method of treating end-stage renal disease. Immunosuppressive therapy plays a pivotal role in the treatment of kidney transplant patients, encompassing all patients (except identical twins), and is administered from organ transplantation until the end of its function. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the evidence of the association between immunosuppressive therapy and nutritional status of patients following kidney transplantation. (2) Methods: This protocol has been designed in line with Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA-P). Our search encompasses several databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE (Elsevier), Scopus and Web of Science. We intend to include observational studies (cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort designs), randomized controlled trials (RCTs), as well as completed and ongoing non-randomized study designs. We will confine our search to studies published in English within the past decade (from inception to 17 February 2023). Qualitative studies, case studies, and conference reports will be excluded. The selection process will be done in Covidence by two independent reviewers. Data extraction will be conducted using a standardized MS Excel template version 16.0. Quality assessment of included studies will be performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials (RoB2), or the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Risk-of-bias plots will be generated using the web application Robvis. Relevant data that have been extracted from eligible studies will be presented in a narrative synthesis. We expect the studies to be too heterogeneous to perform subgroup analyses. (3) Conclusion: This systematic review will offer insights into the evidence regarding association between immunosuppressive therapy and nutritional status of adult patients (18 years of age or older) within the initial year following kidney transplantation. To our knowledge, there is no systematic review addressing that question.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.