ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Exploring the Potential of the Corpus Callosum Area as a Predictive Marker for Impaired Information Processing in Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Volumetric MRI Markers of Cognitive Impairment in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Cerebellar White Matter Loss, Pallidum Atrophy, and Choroid Plexus Enlargement.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Sensitivity and Specificity of a Revised Version of the TRACK-MS Screening Battery for Early Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early cognitive impairment (CI) detection is crucial in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, it can progress silently regardless of relapse activity and reach an advanced stage. We aimed to determine whether the corpus callosum area (CCA) is a sensitive and feasible marker for CI in MS compared to other neuroimaging markers. We assessed cognitive function in 77 MS patients using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Paced Auditory Serial Additions Task, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV, and Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised. The neuroimaging markers included manually measured CCA, two diffusion tensor imaging markers, and nine volumetric measurements. Apart from volumes of the hippocampus and cerebellum, ten markers showed a significant correlation with all neuropsychological tests and significant differences between the groups. The normalized CCA demonstrated a moderate-to-strong correlation with all neuropsychological tests and successfully differentiated between the CI and cognitively normal groups with 80% sensitivity and 83% specificity. The marker had a large area under the curve and a high Youden index (0.82 and 0.63, respectively) and comparability with established cognitive markers. Therefore, the normalized CCA may serve as a reliable marker for CI in MS and can be easily implemented in clinical practice, providing a supportive diagnostic tool for CI in MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.