Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37959389›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Biomaterials and Clinical Application of Dental Implants in Relation to Bone Density-A Narrative Review.

Angkoon Khaohoen, Tanapon Sornsuwan, Pisaisit Chaijareenont, Pongsakorn Poovarodom, Chaiy Rungsiyakull, Pimduen Rungsiyakull

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. [Research progress on three-dimensional finite element analysis for fixed implant restoration of edentulous jaw].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Injectable bioactive scaffold able to stimulate oral bone regeneration on demand.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angkoon KhaohoenDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5666-9171
Tanapon SornsuwanDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand.
Pisaisit ChaijareenontDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Pongsakorn PoovarodomDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Chaiy RungsiyakullDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Pimduen RungsiyakullDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7497-6618

Funding

Chiang Mai University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Titanium has been the material of choice for dental implant fixtures due to its exceptional qualities, such as its excellent balance of rigidity and stiffness. Since zirconia is a soft-tissue-friendly material and caters to esthetic demands, it is an alternative to titanium for use in implants. Nevertheless, bone density plays a vital role in determining the material and design of implants. Compromised bone density leads to both early and late implant failures due to a lack of implant stability. Therefore, this narrative review aims to investigate the influence of implant material/design and surgical technique on bone density from both biomechanical and biological standpoints. Relevant articles were included for analysis. Dental implant materials can be fabricated from titanium, zirconia, and PEEK. In terms of mechanical and biological aspects, titanium is still the gold standard for dental implant materials. Additionally, the macro- and microgeometry of dental implants play a role in determining and planning the appropriate treatment because it can enhance the mechanical stress transmitted to the bone tissue. Under low-density conditions, a conical titanium implant design, longer length, large diameter, reverse buttress with self-tapping, small thread pitch, and deep thread depth are recommended. Implant material, implant design, surgical techniques, and bone density are pivotal factors affecting the success rates of dental implant placement in low-density bone. Further study is required to find the optimal implant material for a clinical setting's bone state.

Indexed as

biomaterialbone densitydental implantsmarginal bone lossosseointegrationtitaniumzirconia

Identifiers

PMID37959389
PMCPMC10649288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.