ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Radiologic Progression of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities following Surgical Resection in Patients with Lung Cancer.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical outcomes of interstitial lung abnormalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Progression of interstitial lung abnormalities and its impact on mortality in patients with lung cancer resection.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026Article
- Current diagnosis, epidemiology, and management of interstitial lung abnormalities.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Prevalence of interstitial lung abnormalities in an adult population: radiological patterns and risk factors.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Imaging in the diagnosis and management of fibrosing interstitial lung diseases.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to assess the prevalence of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and investigate the rates and risk factors associated with radiologic ILA progression among patients with lung cancer following surgical resection. Patients who underwent surgical resection for lung cancer at our institution from January 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively evaluated and grouped according to their ILA status as having no ILAs, equivocal ILAs, or ILAs. Progression was determined by simultaneously reviewing the baseline and corresponding follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans. Among 346 patients (median age: 67 (interquartile range: 60-74) years, 204 (59.0%) men), 22 (6.4%) had equivocal ILAs, and 33 (9.5%) had ILAs detected upon baseline CT. Notably, six patients (6/291; 2.1%) without ILAs upon baseline CT later developed ILAs, and 50% (11/22) of those with equivocal ILAs exhibited progression. Furthermore, 75.8% (25/33) of patients with ILAs upon baseline CT exhibited ILA progression (76.9% and 71.4% with fibrotic and non-fibrotic ILAs, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that ILA status was a significant risk factor for ILA progression. ILAs and equivocal ILAs were associated with radiologic ILA progression after surgical resection in patients with lung cancer. Hence, early ILA detection can significantly affect clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.