Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37959309›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Evidence-Based Analysis of the Critical Steps of Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.

Vincent D D'Andrea, Kevin Melnick, Kendrick Yim, John Ernandez, Nnamdi Onochie, Timothy N Clinton, Graeme S Steele, Mark A Preston, Adam S Kibel, Matthew Mossanen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincent D D'AndreaDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9343-8092
Kevin MelnickDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Kendrick YimDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
John ErnandezDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Nnamdi OnochieDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Timothy N ClintonDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Graeme S SteeleDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Mark A PrestonDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Adam S KibelDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Matthew MossanenDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radical cystectomy (RC) is an integral part of the management of patients with advanced-stage bladder cancer. This major oncologic operation is prone to complications resulting in morbidity and mortality. We analyzed the critical steps of open RC, performed an evidence-based review of these steps, and discussed our experience and approach. We conducted a literature review of the open RC technique, identified the critical steps that consistently appeared across different sources, and organized these steps into a framework. PubMed was queried with the critical steps as keywords for relevant articles published from 1 January 2013 to 1 August 2023. We utilized this query to conduct a systematic review of the literature using the outcomes of overall survival and 90-day complication rate. We developed the "Summary for the 10 Critical Operative Steps of Radical Cystectomy", a concise guide to the approach to open RC. When available, an evidence-based analysis of each critical step was performed. We also included additional components of cystectomy optimization such as pre-habilitation in the preoperative phase, standard versus extended lymphadenectomy, the vaginal-sparing approach to female radical cystectomy, patient-reported outcomes following urinary diversion, the use of a mesh for stoma formation, and the use of the ERAS protocol for postoperative care. An evidence-based assessment of RC may help provide valuable information to optimize surgical techniques and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

bladder cancerradical cystectomysurgical outcomessurgical techniqueurologic oncology

Identifiers

PMID37959309
PMCPMC10647807
OpenAlexW4388017529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.