ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023
Intranasal Synechiae as Complications of Rhinosurgical Treatment-A Review of Current Knowledge.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coating Doyle Nasal Silicone Splints with a Sustained Release Varnish Containing Antibiotics Provides Long-Term Protection fromPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Risk factors leading to the formation of intranasal synechiae (adhesions) in patients who underwent septo- and septoturbinoplasty (a retrospective cohort Study).Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intranasal adhesions (synechiae) develop as a result of improper healing of the nasal mucosa. Their incidence ranges from 6.8% to 36% of rhinosurgical procedures. The aim of this study was to review the available publications and monographs dealing with intranasal adhesions-both in the context of formation and risk factors. The study used a review of the literature to determine the articles and studies available in the following medical databases: MEDLINE (National Library of Medicine's), PubMed, and Google Scholar. The following search terms were used: synechiae nasal + synechial nasal + intranasal adhesions + nasal adhesions. The time criterion of available materials was not applied. Available filters in the search engines were used to narrow down the search results. Artificial intelligence was not applied. The review indicated that the risk of intranasal adhesions correlates with the type of surgery, the surgical technique, the dressing materials, and wound care in the postoperative period. Every case requires an individualized approach. Nasal septum separators, (self-)dissolving dressings and (in selected cases) Mitomycin C were investigated thoroughly. Further studies are required which may result in a universal classification system for intranasal adhesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.