Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37959229›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Diagnostic Accuracy of Abdominal CT for Locally Advanced Colon Tumors: Can We Really Entrust Certain Decisions to the Reliability of CT?

Yaiza García Del Álamo Hernández, Óscar Cano-Valderrama, Carlos Cerdán-Santacruz, Fernando Pereira Pérez, Inés Aldrey Cao, Sandra Núñez Fernández, Eduardo Álvarez Sarrado, Rosángela Obregón Reina, Paula Dujovne Lindenbaum, María Taboada Ameneiro and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Yaiza García Del Álamo HernándezColorectal Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Óscar Cano-ValderramaColorectal Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, 36312 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0775-6217
Carlos Cerdán-SantacruzColorectal Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), 28006 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6507-900X
Fernando Pereira PérezGeneral Surgery Department, Hospital de Fuenlabrada, 28942 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9976-5112
Inés Aldrey CaoColorectal Surgery Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, 32005 Ourense, Spain.
Sandra Núñez FernándezColorectal Surgery Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, 32005 Ourense, Spain.
Eduardo Álvarez SarradoColorectal Surgery Department, Hospital Politécnico Universitario la Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1389-7892
Rosángela Obregón ReinaColorectal Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
Paula Dujovne LindenbaumColorectal Surgery Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain.
María Taboada AmeneiroColorectal Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), 15006 A Coruña, Spain.
David Ambrona ZafraColorectal Surgery Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain.
Silvia Pérez FarréColorectal Surgery Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova de Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain.
Marta Pascual DamietaColorectal Surgery Department, Hospital del Mar de Barcelona, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0849-9048
Ricardo Frago MontanuyDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Bellvitge University Hospital, University of Barcelona and IDIBELL, 08908 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Blas Flor LorenteColorectal Surgery Department, Hospital Politécnico Universitario la Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain.
Sebastiano BiondoDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Bellvitge University Hospital, University of Barcelona and IDIBELL, 08908 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7374-0371
Collaborative Group For The Study Of Metachronous Peritoneal Metastases Of pT Colon CancerSpanish Surgical Society Colorectal and Peritoneal Surgery Sections, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ESBellvitge University Hospital · ESHospital Arnau de Vilanova · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESHospital Del Mar · ESHospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada · ESSpanish Society of Family and Community Medicine · ESUniversity Hospital Complex Of Vigo · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many different options of neoadjuvant treatments for advanced colon cancer are emerging. An accurate preoperative staging is crucial to select the most appropriate treatment option. A retrospective study was carried out on a national series of operated patients with T4 tumors. Considering the anatomo-pathological analysis of the surgical specimen as the gold standard, a diagnostic accuracy study was carried out on the variables T and N staging and the presence of peritoneal metastases (M1c). The parameters calculated were sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios, as well as the overall accuracy. A total of 50 centers participated in the study in which 1950 patients were analyzed. The sensitivity of CT for correct staging of T4 colon tumors was 57%. Regarding N staging, the overall accuracy was 63%, with a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 62%; however, the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.7 and 0.58, respectively. For the diagnosis of peritoneal metastases, the accuracy was 94.8%, with a sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 98%; in the case of peritoneal metastases, the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 24.4 and 0.61, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of CT in the setting of advanced colon cancer still has some shortcomings for accurate diagnosis of stage T4, correct classification of lymph nodes, and preoperative detection of peritoneal metastases.

Indexed as

advanced colon cancerCT stagingdiagnostic accuracy

Identifiers

PMID37959229
PMCPMC10648183
OpenAlexW4387957203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.