Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37959102›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Status of Marine Mussel Pollution Research in South Africa (2012-2022).

Deborah Caitlin Firth, Lutz Auerswald, Philip E Strydom, Louwrens Christiaan Hoffman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Deborah Caitlin FirthDepartment of Animal Science, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 7600, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8908-2142
Lutz AuerswaldDepartment of Animal Science, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 7600, South Africa.
Philip E StrydomDepartment of Animal Science, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 7600, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6855-688X
Louwrens Christiaan HoffmanDepartment of Animal Science, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 7600, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2736-1933

Funding

Department of Science and Innovation UID: 84633Harry Crossley Foundation 19407211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing human population requires more food each year, and seafood products can help meet this demand if clean water resources are available for their growth. Farmed and wild mussels are environmentally friendly seafood with many health benefits to human consumers, but they can also pose a health risk if they are harvested from areas where marine anthropogenic pollution is uncontrolled or unmonitored. While the coastline in South Africa has long been assumed to be pristine, a growing number of recent studies are raising contamination concerns. Baseline studies establish a wide range of anthropogenic pollutants to be present in the marine environment, specifically in urbanised or industrialised areas like major cities or harbours. This review summarises how mussels could pose health risks to human consumers and the current research that is being conducted by private researchers and institutions in South Africa. The review emphasises the need for more research in the field and for governmental pollution monitoring data to be released to the public.

Indexed as

microplasticsmusselsorganic pollutantspollutionSouth Africatrace elements

Identifiers

PMID37959102
PMCPMC10648133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.