Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37959028›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Exploring the Functional Properties of Propolis, Geopropolis, and Cerumen, with a Special Emphasis on Their Antimicrobial Effects.

Bajaree Chuttong, Kaiyang Lim, Pichet Praphawilai, Khanchai Danmek, Jakkrawut Maitip, Patricia Vit, Ming-Cheng Wu, Sampat Ghosh, Chuleui Jung, Michael Burgett and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bajaree ChuttongMeliponini and Apini Research Laboratory, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6009-2902
Kaiyang LimES-TA Technology Pte Ltd., Singapore 368819, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-4800-9381
Pichet PraphawilaiMeliponini and Apini Research Laboratory, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Khanchai DanmekSchool of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Phayao, Phayao 56000, Thailand.
Jakkrawut MaitipFaculty of Science, Energy and Environment, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, Rayong Campus, Bankhai, Rayong 21120, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6265-1421
Patricia VitApitherapy and Bioactivity, Food Science Department, Faculty of Pharmacy and Bioanalysis, Universidad de Los Andes, Merida 5001, Venezuela.
Ming-Cheng WuDepartment of Entomology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan.
Sampat GhoshAgriculture Science and Technology Research Institute, Andong National University, Andong 36729, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1243-8344
Chuleui JungDepartment of Plant Medical, Andong National University, Andong 36729, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8134-9279
Michael BurgettMeliponini and Apini Research Laboratory, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Surat HongsibsongSchool of Health Sciences Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5510-5905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bee propolis has been touted as a natural antimicrobial agent with the potential to replace antibiotics. Numerous reports and reviews have highlighted the functionalities and applications of the natural compound. Despite much clamor for the downstream application of propolis, there remain many grounds to cover, especially in the upstream production, and factors affecting the quality of the propolis. Moreover, geopropolis and cerumen, akin to propolis, hold promise for diverse human applications, yet their benefits and intricate manufacturing processes remain subjects of intensive research. Specialized cement bees are pivotal in gathering and transporting plant resins from suitable sources to their nests. Contrary to common belief, these resins are directly applied within the hive, smoothed out by cement bees, and blended with beeswax and trace components to create raw propolis. Beekeepers subsequently harvest and perform the extraction of the raw propolis to form the final propolis extract that is sold on the market. As a result of the production process, intrinsic and extrinsic factors, such as botanical origins, bee species, and the extraction process, have a direct impact on the quality of the final propolis extract. Towards the end of this paper, a section is dedicated to highlighting the antimicrobial potency of propolis extract.

Indexed as

antibiotics replacementantimicrobial potencycerumengeopropolishoney beepropolisquality factorsstingless bee

Identifiers

PMID37959028
PMCPMC10648409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.